Jim Cramer's Best Blogs

NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- Jim Cramer fills his blog on RealMoney every day with his up-to-the-minute reactions to what's happening in the market and his legendary ahead-of-the-crowd ideas. This week he discussed:
  • Apple's arrogance; and
  • why Netflix is soaring.

Click here for information on RealMoney, where you can see all the blogs, including Jim Cramer's -- and reader comments -- in real time.

Everybody Wants Some

Posted at 10:55 a.m. EST on Friday, Jan. 25

Overshooting is something, isn't it? There are times when, if you take your cue from a stock's action, it will drive you crazy. Apple ( AAPL) is one of those stocks right now.

Put simply, if you want growth -- consistent growth that makes you feel the name will do even better in the out years than it is doing now -- you have to buy Apple right here.

But if you see a flattening of growth or, heaven forbid, an actual contraction, then you have to sell it right here.

At this moment, the bearish view has more adherents than the bullish one does, so the stock is being sold. In the meantime, bewildered people who bought it because it was rising, of course, are taking their cue from the fact that it is now going lower.

Both groups of sellers, meanwhile, are heavily motivated either by what they perceive to be their charter or by fear itself.

What do the buyers have? How about discipline? Anyone who is a value-stock buyer knows the drill of growth going to value. There is no hurry, because there will be no quick reversal unless the company does something big and bold. While Apple is certainly a big and bold product creator, it is not a big and bold stock-market manager. I bet there isn't a soul on the top level of Apple who thinks this stock-market move is right. I bet few even fathom it.

Last night, on Twitter, there was a post @jimcramer claiming I was wrong Thursday when I said the conference call drove it lower.

It was a stupid, uninformed comment. First, that isn't what I said. I just said it was a bad conference call, because you could see the stock drop, yet it didn't matter to Apple's participants on the call.

Second, that lack of acknowledgement thus failed to break the free fall in the company's stock. If you think your sole job is to build the best products available, then you shouldn't care about the stock -- as long as you build the best products available. Much of the selling is coming from people who believe other companies are now building equally good products that they're selling more cheaply vs. Apple.

That means either Apple has to bring down the price point of its products -- which is going to lead to a decline in gross margins and a decline in sales -- or it has to come up with a new product we haven't thought of. The product would have to be capable of producing an acceleration in sales and an attendant acceleration in gross margin in the out years.

Others thought, correctly, that I believe Apple will announce some sort of plan for its $128 per share in cash. That, again, would require thoughts about the stock, and they are top of mind.

Now, you could argue that all of this is binary. You could say that, if you care about the quality of the products then you can't care about the stock -- that the stock has to sort itself out eventually before it goes higher.

That would be terrific if it were the case. But stocks don't play by product rules. There is an etiquette involved that forces most management teams to play by the rules, and give you hope that the stock's trajectory -- as clearly seen by flashing numbers postearnings -- is wrong. But Apple's smug confidence made you feel the trajectory is right. If they don't want to get us to buy the stock by acknowledging that free fall, then why should we? We have plenty of management teams who care about product and stock and who will address the slowing phenomena.

Put simply, I believe Apple is overshooting its fair-value trading through apples-to-apples comparisons with such names as Intel ( INTC) or Microsoft ( MSFT). But those companies are doing lots to stabilize their respective stock prices, such as paying out good dividends and implementing fulsome buybacks. One has to ask: What exactly is Apple's excuse for not playing by the rules? Arrogance, alas, is not an answer.

At the time of publication, Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust, was long AAPL.

Why Netflix Could Fly Even Higher

Posted at 7:07 p.m. EST on Thursday, Jan. 24

"They need Netflix ( NFLX) as much as Netflix needs them." And with that line, you saw one of the major reasons that Netflix took off today, not just because of the 8% increase in subscribers, even if they are pure profit.

Right now, the biggest hits on television are serial productions for outfits such as AMC and FX. "Mad Men," "Sons of Anarchy," "Justified," "Breaking Bad," you name it, that's what people talk about, that's what they watch.

We know that the broadcast networks don't like serials or arcs. They want to able to plug and play any episode out of order -- think "Seinfeld" or "Law & Order."

But the real heavyweight stuff that's getting the great numbers, like "Walking Dead," can't be watched plug and play. They have to be watched in order, so you can't just jump right in.

Enter Netflix. As Reed Hastings said on the call, the makers of "Breaking Bad" and "Mad Men," two examples he called to mind, need Netflix so that people can catch up by bingeing. It empowers these small networks, and it actually makes them more valuable, not just Netflix.

That, plus the new tablets and the ease of streaming, including the button on many new TV clickers, explains the resurgence here.

And it is impressive.

Which got me to thinking how obvious it is that Apple ( AAPL) has to buy Netflix. Instantly, Apple would become the destination for new TV. Instantly, Apple would be the de facto cable company for youth that doesn't want to have to wait until Thursday night at 8 for their program.

And instantly, people would binge and get started on new sets of shows effortlessly while being a friend to those who make that content. It can make content itself or augment the content that Netflix is buying. With 28 million subs who want to watch on their "phablets" -- smartphones and Tablets -- a loaded Netflix app may be the best way for Apple to rekindle the affections of young people.

Small amount of money for large binge-watchers and their friends. Something that would send Apple's stock up maybe 10% when it did it, or maybe, given how oversold this one is, even more.

Sure, Netflix has doubled.

But, like Apple, it used to be much higher. This can be as easily justified as watching the new season of "Justified"!

At the time of publication, Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust, was long AAPL.

More from Investing

When Is It 'Worth It' to Work With a Financial Advisor?

When Is It 'Worth It' to Work With a Financial Advisor?

Amazon, Microsoft and Google Face Backlash over ICE, Military Deals

Amazon, Microsoft and Google Face Backlash over ICE, Military Deals

3 Great Stock Market Sectors Millennials Should Invest In

3 Great Stock Market Sectors Millennials Should Invest In

Why Millennials Are Ditching Stocks for ETFs

Why Millennials Are Ditching Stocks for ETFs

Trump's 'Space Force' Could Launch a $1 Trillion Industry, Morgan Stanley Says

Trump's 'Space Force' Could Launch a $1 Trillion Industry, Morgan Stanley Says