The Motorola devices, however, are not Nexus devices. The currentversion of Android running on Nexus is 4.2.1. Some of the Motoroladevices just got 4.1, but many Motorola devices are not there yet, and some will never get there. Some won't even get to 4.0, even though it was launched more than a year ago. Demand for "pure Nexus" has increased dramatically in recent months asmore consumers realize they don't want to have phone manufacturers and mobile network operators force Android modifications upon them. Consumers want their OS upgrades, and they want them as soon as Google issues them. If you buy a non-Nexus device, you may have to wait three to 18 months for an OS upgrade, if you receive one at all. This is unacceptable underany circumstance, and that's why demand for Nexus Android devices isgoing through the roof. The wait list to buy a Nexus 4 directly fromGoogle has been mostly one month or more since it launched almost threemonths ago. That's longer wait times than for the iPhone at launch! So here is Google's problem, among many. On the one hand, it's gotNexus smartphones, which have the software people want. On the otherhand, it's got Motorola smartphones, and at least one of those modelshas the battery life people -- and Larry Page -- want. Why can't Google sell us smartphones -- and for that matter otherdevices -- that have both great battery life and the right, unmolested software, i.e., Nexus? From the outside, it seems that Google is not talking to itself. It'sgot a person running Motorola in Illinois: Dennis Woodside. It'sgot another person allegedly in charge of hardware: Lior Ron,according to media reports. So who is running the Android hardwareshow at Google? When Larry Page says on the quarterly conference call that battery life is a "huge issue," is he talking to Motorola inIllinois? Is he talking to the Nexus group across the street from hisoffice in Mountain View, Calif.? If he is, nobody has beenlistening.
I recognize that in the grand scheme of things, this isn't the biggestissue in the world, and it is isn't even Google's most pressing issue. But Google is up against Apple ( AAPL), Microsoft ( MSFT), Research In Motion ( RIMM) and all of theirhardware implementations. They are focusing on improving batterylife. Google says it's a priority, but it's not showing in theflagship Nexus smartphones. Google's product management of Android in the context of Motorola andNexus is less clear than it should be, to put it mildly. I can guess what might be going on behind the scenes, but I don't really know. Given Android's enormous market share and importance for Google and the market, I think that this is a subject Google should clarify in a separate stand-alone conference call. Everyone wants a Nexus product portfolio that has batterylife on par with the Droid Razr Maxx or even better. However, nobody wants to be forced to buy this from Verizon, and nobody wants to be forced to buy non-Nexus software OS. They want to buy a piece of hardware directly from Google, insert anySIM card acquired from any retailer in the world, such as Wal-Mart ( WMT), which offers great plans for $30 or so per month, and not have to sign any contract. They want to be able to switch to another SIM card from any carrier in the world without any fuss. This is what GSM was always meant to be, and has been for most people in the world for 20 years. Larry Page apparently wants that, too. So why can't he get hisvarious Android groups -- from the Nexus people to the Motorola people-- to talk and deliver? Last June, Google bragged that it got ASUS to deliver the Nexus 7tablet in only four months from beginning of the project, to shippingthe product to consumers. Now Google says it takes Motorola 18 monthsto deliver new products. Why is it acceptable for Motorola to take 18months when Google itself brags that ASUS has already done it in fourmonths? Google, and Android, are doing well. But clearly, they're not doing as well as they could be. I'd like to know what they are doing to change this. At the time of publication, Wahlman was long GOOG andAAPL, and short MSFT. Follow @antonwahlman This article was written by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.