- how to invest in the current market; and
- why you shouldn't sell your Google shares.
This Is More Than a Squeeze Posted at 6:28 p.m. EST on Friday, Jan. 4 Five-year highs for the S&P 500? What the heck? Must be all short-covering? No, I don't think so. I think there's simply a level of Washington ennui that's pervading the market. The people who haven't left the building are people who increasingly, I believe, won't be shaken out by the next Washington crisis. That doesn't mean that they won't get spooked by bad earnings if we have them. But think of it like this: If you sold on the debt downgrade last year, if you sold on the election jitters, and if you sold on the fiscal cliff, and if you sold on the dividend tax increase and if you sold on the utterances of politicians, you do look pretty stupid at five-year highs, don't you? So much money was deferred from the market. So many people decided that dividends would cease to matter that much. So many hedge funds decided that the earnings had to be horrible that the spook factor was as high as I can recall. Now, we know from Ulta Salon ( ULTA), which guided "too in-line"; Lululemon Athletica ( LULU), which got downgraded; Mellanox Technologies ( MLNX), which had hideous earnings; and Family Dollar ( FDO), which had terrible guidance, that you aren't safe from disappointing individual company reports. But that's different from being in an unsafe market. Those stocks are all pretty highly valued and didn't have dividend protection and are ahead, not behind, the market. I think the reaction of the OK retailers to the OK news -- witness the positive reaction to allegedly disappointing Target ( TGT) numbers -- is indicative that there was a short base in that group. In general, though, the multiples aren't stretched for the big caps, international is getting better, and the individual has figured out how much to put into his or her 401(k) and retirement plans, now that we know the rules. Those who need yield went back in. Those who hadn't sold yet were given no new reason to sell.
Three Reasons Why You Shouldn't Sell Google Posted at 12:51 p.m. EST on Friday, Jan. 4 You want a tough call? What do you do with Google ( GOOG)? Here's a company that missed the last quarter. Missed badly. Seemed to have no plan for taking up the slack of a potential slowdown in advertising. Seemed to have no plan to rein in costs. The result? A huge downdraft, a 100-point drop, frightening and devastating to the bulls. Now look at the stock. Here it is creeping back to the levels it stood at before the disappointment, and doing so before we see any numbers that tell us it deserves to retake that ground. So why not sell it? Let me give you three reasons. First, the decision by the Federal Trade Commission to let Google off without as much as a real slap on the wrist, let alone restrictions and break-ups, is monumental. First, those of us who remember the dramatic showdown between the Justice Department and Microsoft ( MSFT) in the late 1990s had to be fearful that the FTC would take a look at Google's remarkable market share in search, at 70%, and decide, per se, that it is a monopolist and that it was, like so many other monopolists, abusing its power.