How Different Sector ETFs Are Reacting to Fiscal Cliff Fears

NEW YORK (ETF Expert) -- Many of us in the financial services industry expected the outcome of the election to be determined by Ohio alone. Perhaps surprisingly, while Ohio was close throughout the evening, there was never a need for recounting the "Buckeye State" ballots; President Obama had won the electoral votes needed without a single-state showdown.

While a protracted battle for control of the White House could have unhinged market participants, the possibility quickly gave way to the more pressing "fiscal cliff." The cessation of scores of tax breaks combined with automatic spending cuts can be credited with enormous selling pressure across the risk spectrum on Wednesday, the day after the election.

Unlike election uncertainty, however, market watchers have been warning about the ramifications of a prolonged fiscal debate for months. Recently, I identified three broad ETF categories that are less troubled by the partisan divide on on tax extensions and budgetary belt-tightening.

Now, though, investors have been running for the hills. Other than risk-off bond choices, there's very little in the positive column.

That said, it may be instructive to view how the different economic segments are faring. Indeed, not every stock ETF is down as much as the broader S&P 500 SPDR Trust ( SPY), off 2.3%:

Vanguard Real Estate Investment Trust REIT ( VNQ), -0.5%

SPDR Select Consumer Staples ( XLP), -1.2%

SPDR Select Consumer Discretionary ( XLY), -1.2%

SPDR Select Materials ( XLB), -1.5%

SPDR Select Health Care ( XLV), -1.7%

SPDR Select Utilities ( XLU), -2.2%

Vanguard Telecom ( VOX), -2.4%

SPDR Select Technology ( XLK), -2.4%

SPDR Select Industrials ( XLI), -2.5%

SPDR Select Biotech ( XBI), -2.5%

SPDR Select Energy ( XLE), -2.8%

SPDR Select Financials ( XLF), -3.5%

As one might anticipate, most of the economically sensitive sectors have been getting hit the hardest. Energy (XLE), Industrials (XLI), Financials (XLF) and Technology (XLK) have taken the brunt of the risk-off activity.

There are several areas that may represent pockets of opportunity. For example, few areas of the market have been ravaged more by weak domestic and weak global demand than Materials (XLB). Why, then, should this sector behave a bit like a non-cyclical segment?

There are two possibilities. First, more and more folks believe in the probability of a resilient China. The more Chinese demand for "stuff," the better XLB performs. Indeed, the series of "higher lows" in September, October and November for the XLB:SPY price ratio is a sign of relative strength in the materials arena.

There's another possibility, albeit a stealth one at that. President Obama's victory assures a continuation of the ultra-easy monetary policy of the Federal Reserve. (Note: Mitt Romney had talked about his opposition to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke's electronic money printing.) It follows that there are a number of gold/metals miners in the S&P Basic Materials Index like Newmont Mining ( NEM); some of them were essentially flat on the trading session, as gold figures to benefit from Obama's second term.

Last, but not least, Consumer Discretionary (XLY) showed signs of relative strength in the dramatic selloff as well. It may speak to the electorate's increasing consumption and increasing sentiment. It may also be ignoring revenue misses and poor earnings guidance going forward, but that's for another discussion.

Market Vectors Retail ( RTH) may offer a less volatile way to invest in the consumer. It is weighted equally between consumer defensive and cyclical consumer stationary and has a lower beta than XLY. Yet, RTH has outperformed XLY year-to-date.

This article was written by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.

Disclosure Statement: ETF Expert is a website that makes the world of ETFs easier to understand. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial and/or its clients may hold positions in ETFs, mutual funds and investment assets mentioned. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert website. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships. You may review additional ETF Expert at the site.

Gary Gordon reads:

Real Clear Markets
Jeff Miller
Charles Kirk
On Twitter, Gary Gordon follows:

Jonathan Hoenig
Doug Kass
Hard Assets Investor

More from ETFs

3 Great Stock Market Sectors Millennials Should Invest In

3 Great Stock Market Sectors Millennials Should Invest In

Why Millennials Are Ditching Stocks for ETFs

Why Millennials Are Ditching Stocks for ETFs

60 Seconds: What's the Difference Between an ETF and a Mutual Fund?

60 Seconds: What's the Difference Between an ETF and a Mutual Fund?

Video: Why Shark Tank Star Kevin O'Leary Is Doubling Down on Internet Stocks

Video: Why Shark Tank Star Kevin O'Leary Is Doubling Down on Internet Stocks

Simple Investing Strategies Stand the Test of Time

Simple Investing Strategies Stand the Test of Time