Compared to FOLFIRINOX, Abraxane appears to cause less severe vomiting, diarrhea and febrile neutropenia, a sign of infection. However, Abraxane is responsible for more severe thrombocytopenia (low platelets) and sensory neuropathy, or nerve damage, in the arms and legs, than FOLFIRINOX

Febrile neutropenia and sensory neuropathy are the most worrisome side effects for each drug, with good reason. An infection with a low white blood cell count can kill, and persistent, severe tingling of the hands and feet can meaningfully impair quality of life. (Consider Celgene's Thalomid and Takeda's Velcade, both of which have been hindered commercially by a tendency to cause sensory neuropathy.)

The most common pushback against FOLFIRINOX becoming widely used in pancreatic cancer is that the regimen is too toxic for patients to tolerate. I don't think that's true, at least for relatively healthy patients. Nevertheless, Abraxane's side effects are worth keeping an eye on.

The most significant hindrance to FOLFIRINOX's adoption in the pancreatic cancer treatment landscape may be the simple fact that the four drugs in the regimen are all generic, meaning no company is out there actively marketing it to doctors.

Celgene, however, will be marketing Abraxane aggressively to pancreatic cancer specialists, if approved. The company's salesforce will likely be able to assuage concerns about Abraxane's toxicity, suggest appropriate patients for initial use, and highlight potentially compelling details in the dataset -- such as the possible correlation between high levels of secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine, a membrane protein known as SPARC, and longer median survival.

There is one point of concern that makes me a little nervous. Based on an interim analysis, the independent monitors overseeing the Abraxane pancreatic cancer study recommended to Celgene that the trial increase in size by nearly 34%. That's potentially important, as it could indicate the data monitors saw a smaller-than-expected benefit for Abraxane versus control during the interim analysis. It's more likely that I'm being too much of a worrywart.

In aggregate, the data suggest Abraxane will have favorable risk-benefit profile in pancreatic cancer. Current analyst consensus estimates include only roughly $730 million in 2015 Abraxane sales across all indications, well below management's guidance of sales reaching $1 billion to $1.25 billion. That suggests most Street analysts don't expect the drug to work. Clearly, success in phase III would force those projections upwards.

Time will tell.

Two related notes: Read Jim Silverman's column on buying the Celgene contingent value rights (CVR) ( CELGZ) as a bullish trade tied to the positive outcome in the Abraxane pancreatic cancer trial.

If Abraxane demonstrates a clinically meaningful survival benefit in pancreatic cancer, Threshold Pharmaceuticals' ( THLD) pancreatic cancer drug TH-302 could be obsolete even before its phase III study is completed.

Sadeghi has no position in Celgene.

Follow Nathan Sadeghi-Nejad on Twitter.
Nathan Sadeghi-Nejad has 15 years experience as a professional health-care investor, most recently as a sector head for Highside Capital. He has worked on the sell side (with independent research boutiques Sturza's Medical Research and Avalon Research) and the buyside (at Kilkenny Capital prior to Highside). Sadeghi-Nejad is a graduate of Columbia University and lives in New York. You can follow him on Twitter @natesadeghi.

If you liked this article you might like

How I've Prepared for Hurricane Irma -- and a Market Pullback

How I'm Prepared for Irma -- and a Pullback

Juno, bluebird In Focus as Targets Following Gilead-Kite Aquisition

Apple Is the Tom Brady of Stocks: Cramer's 'Mad Money' Recap (Thursday 8/31/17)

Cramer: Fantasy Shmantasy -- Let's Get Real With These Stock Picks