If you are a member of the Class described above, you may move the Court, no later than November 6, 2012, to serve as lead plaintiff; however, you must meet certain legal requirements. If you would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this Notice or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Michael Goldberg, Esquire, of Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP, 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles, California 90067, by telephone at (310) 201-9150 or Toll Free at (888) 773-9224, by e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org, or visit our website at http://www.glancylaw.com.This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.
Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP, representing investors of Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. (“Ubiquiti” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:UBNT), announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of a class (the “Class”) consisting of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Ubiquiti common stock between October 14, 2011 and August 9, 2012, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and/or all persons who acquired shares of Ubiquiti common stock pursuant or traceable to the Company’s allegedly false and misleading Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with its October 14, 2011 initial public offering. A copy of the Complaint is available from the court or from Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP. Please contact us by phone to discuss this action or to obtain a copy of the Complaint at (310) 201-9150 or Toll Free at (888) 773-9224, or by email at email@example.com. Ubiquiti, together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, offers a portfolio of wireless networking products and solutions. The Complaint alleges that the defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse facts concerning the Company's business and operations, including: (i) the true magnitude of the risks the Company faced from counterfeit copies of its products including the popular and profitable AirMax product line; (ii) the widespread nature and extent of the counterfeit-product operations, and the impact those activities would have on the Company’s future operating results; (iii) the increased risks to the Company’s operations due to its unique business model, whereby it exclusively relied on distributors to sell its products to end customers; (iv) that the Company lacked the proper internal controls to prevent its product designs from being stolen and replicated; and (v) as a result of the above, the Company’s financial statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.