Bill Flora, creative director at a design firm in Seattle called Tectonic, acknowledged both positive and negative feelings about the verdict. On the one hand, it could force mobile companies to focus more on design rather than simply acting as copycats, said Mr. Flora, a former Microsoft designer who played a central role in creating the look of its Windows Phone software.Might Microsoft win? Possibly. But they also might fall victim to a minefield or two. At the time of publication, the author had no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in this column. This article is commentary by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.
But he said the decision could also create a "minefield" for product designers, in which they are constantly second-guessing whether functions will step on someone else's patents.
GOOG) Android products -- are different than the iPhone, so will succeed. Forbes and many others went with the knee-jerk: "In The Apple vs. Samsung Decision, The Real Winner Is Microsoft's Windows Phone." There are two problems with the media's dearly held line of thought here. For one, Windows phones still have to be good -- and they aren't yet. Granted, they've garnered decent reviews here and there, but they haven't resonated with the public. Will the Nokia ( NOK) smartphones with Windows 8, expected soon, do the trick? That question is a big variable, far bigger than headlines like "Windows Wins!" allow. Moreover, this suit could cast a pall on the whole smartphone business, with lawsuits raising the cost of doing business and turning companies fearful of innovation. The New York Times did well to air this thought in an article titled: "Apple Case Muddies the Future of Innovations." They even quoted a leading Microsoft Windows phone designed in this regard: