Factors that could cause the company’s results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements are contained in the company’s press release announcing its Q2 2012 earning and in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and including its reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, its report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, and other recent filings with the SEC.The company undertakes no obligation to revise or update forward-looking statements as a result of new information, since these statements may no longer be accurate or timely. Similar to our experience in Q3 of last year, Q2 bookings were suppressed by the increased uncertainties of economy. This is most evident in Europe where on a year-to-date basis bookings were down 61% from the same period last year. There seems to be a lot of trepidation to sign any contracts of significant size. In fact, we observed that some larger license arrangements splitted to a series of smaller projects, which are then scheduled throughout the year, with only a portion called in Q2. The second, third and fourth stages of these now segment of larger projects have been moved out into each quarters. As a result, we are actual closed more license arrangements in Q2 than in Q1 and more towards the first half of this year than we did in the first half of last year, but the average deal size is greatly reduced. In addition to larger deals being split into series of small ones, customer uncertainty and budget constraints have also shown up in some larger contingent license arrangement. In a couple of cases we find reasonably large license arrangements, but we have only recognized as a booking or as revenue, but first usually smaller portion of the license while the remaining piece will not be recorded until a future specified date when contingencies expired.
Arrangements with contingencies are not in our backlog as detailed on page 33 of our 10-Q since these analysis we only include non-cancelable arrangement. The net result like last year is a very backend loaded year for new license bookings.Lastly, there was a significant swing towards term licenses in the quarter. A change in the mix has a medium impact on revenue and earnings, since revenues and term licenses is generally recognize over the five years, where perpetual licenses are usually recognized in the quarter that they report. Our move to more term licenses combined with a more backend loaded years means that we will have fewer quarters than 2012 to recognize term license. As a result, it will be very difficult to receive $500 million in revenue, even if as we expect, we hit organic reporting score. In spite of the influence of US healthcare, primarily US based (inaudible) both communications and life sciences were up on a year-to-date basis compared to last year. While bookings were down for the first six months in 2012 as compared to 2011, our backlog has been very strong. Our off balance sheet backlog have signed non-cancelable licenses get down on $2.1 million from December 31st and backlog is up $77.2 million from $130.6 million at June 30, 2011 to $207.8 million at June 30, 2012; $73 million of the $77.2 million increase is in term licenses; the details as how we will take this backlog to the P&L in future periods is shown on page 33 of our 10-Q. In addition to the increase in term license backlog on page 33, the impact of this quarter is changing our next quarter’s more term licenses showed on the financial statement. As I said, term license revenue generally recognized over five years, so increase in term license booking take a while to go to P&L. The move the term licenses in Q4 and again in Q2 resulted in term license revenue for the first six months being up $6 million as compared to 2011. However, the mix change shows up immediately with perpetual licenses as revenues down by $10.8 million on year-to-date basis from last year. Read the rest of this transcript for free on seekingalpha.com