T). In exchange for this and other things Apple wanted to control, Apple was willing to give AT&T an exclusivity period for several years (in America).
Of course, the iPhone was such a hit Apple was able to bring the iPhone to multiple carriers in the U.S. and never faced any carrier restrictions in other countries. The iPhone has been a net positive for all carriers. Carrying a hit phone is good for them. Ending unlimited data plans is good for them. Training users to become data hogs is a good thing for them -- unless they can't afford to upgrade their networks. It's clearly set them up for being perceived of as "just" a pipe now and in the future, though. It's probably going to be tougher and tougher for any of them to differentiate from each other. It's now been five years since its introduction of the iPhone, and the other handset makers have been decimated. With the exception of Samsung, there's not another handset maker in the world that has been able to show it can make any money. Weaker ones are out of business. Stronger ones are trying to mimic the iPhone as much as they can. A couple of formerly dominant players -- Nokia ( NOK) and Research In Motion ( RIMM) -- seem on their deathbeds. Google has come from nowhere five years ago to be a dominant player today, but still hardly makes any money at it. Motorola ( MOT) used to make good money selling Razr phones and now we'll see if Google ( GOOG) finds what it needs with its purchase of Motorola Mobility. The most profound changes iPhone wrought are really in what we -- as users -- expect from our phones and how we use them. Don't forget, there was a reason many people called the original iPhone a "Jesus Phone": It has made a post-PC world possible. We now expect to get the full power of the Web on our phones.
|Make no mistake, five years from now, the television industry will have been deeply affected by Apple TV.|
The biggest wireless carriers have spent billions upgrading their networks to try and have an edge providing better services to their data hungry users. It's hard not to think the same kind of tsunami might be getting ready to hit the television industry with the introduction of Apple TV. Some, including Henry Blodget, are playing up the changes by suggesting the traditional TV industry is about to collapse. Others, such as Dan Frommer, think cable and traditional TV are too powerful to succumb to any changes Apple might throw at it. The reality will probably come in between, just as has been the case in the telecom industry. In the TV industry, there's the other TV set makers, the other streamers, the cable companies/networks (aren't they one and the same now?) and the content producers. The TV makers appear to be ready to reprise the role of the handset makers, struggling to make a profit. Apple has the advantage of already locking up long-term supply contracts. It'll also be able to charge decent margins or (more frightening for competitors) take a more aggressive approach, as with the iPad. And unlike the competitors they don't have to give up any of their margins to the Best Buys ( BBY) of the world -- glorified middlemen. Apple sells it all direct -- online or through their network of stores. The streamers also look like they'll have a hard time competing. Apple can offer content producers a great platform with lots of subscribers. At the end of the day, that's what Hollywood wants. If the price for content goes up, Apple can belly up to the bar. Hollywood seems ambivalent about Apple TV. It sees what the 99-cent deal did to the music industry a dozen years ago and doesn't want to make the same mistake. Yet it also sees a world moving toward four screens (TV, PC, phone and tablet) and increasingly mobile. It knows HBO Go is the start of something, with or without Apple. But, at the end of the day, it'll be the content people want to see. Hollywood can either go ultra-premium (think Game of Thrones) or low-cost reality show. There will also be millions of iJustines fighting for attention. Most people seem to think the cable companies and networks will be destroyed by Apple pushing an a la carte model. Yet, it's tough for me to see that Apple would be intent on killing ABC and Disney ( DIS) when Bob Iger sits on Apple's board and Steve Jobs' estate is the biggest owner of Disney stock. Disney has also signed a 10-year deal for ESPN with Comcast ( CMCSA) recently. So, I think Apple is going to be playing for the long term with TV. It's not about "killing" an entire industry. It's about delivering the best TV experience anyone has ever had. It probably means lots of help from Siri making suggestions for you. It probably does mean the "app-ification" of TV channels. It probably means the deep integration of Twitter and Facebook ( FB) into the TV experience. Mostly it probably means better software and artificial intelligence than any TV maker has ever seen before. But make no mistake, five years from now, the television industry will be as deeply affected by the arrival as the telecom industry is today. This article is commentary by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.