Time to Apologize to Apple's Board

NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- It's now been a week since Steve Jobs died. Tim Cook is now Apple's ( AAPL) CEO. Since Apple closed on Oct. 5 at $378, the stock is up 7.4% -- which is about 1.5% better than the Nasdaq. The company has announced its 4S version of the iPhone and rolled out its latest iOS 5.

Obviously, we won't know the true long-term ramifications of the loss of Steve Jobs to Apple for a long time -- maybe seven years. However, it's obvious that the company has managed the transition from Jobs to Cook rather successfully.

Shouldn't Apple's board of directors get some credit for this successful transition?

A few months ago, there was a steady drumbeat of criticism directed toward the board from what Conrad Black would probably call the "corporate governance zealots." Readers know that I'm one of the bigger proponents of strong corporate governance. But I must admit, it's been puzzling to me some of the governance criticism directed to Apple in the last year. A few days ago, Reuters ran a story with the headline: "Apple's board needs to step up to new era." Here are some of quotes from several "experts" about how Apple's board needs to be changed in the wake of Jobs' death.
"The old message was 'trust Steve,' the new message has to be 'trust the team.' ... It's no longer the cult of personality." said Jim Post, a professor of corporate governance at Boston University School of Management who called for an independent chairman.

"The board needs to be expanded. They need to bring on additional independent talent ... people who were not living in Steve's shadow," he said.

"Much like Disney, Apple's founder was the brand. He was their Mickey Mouse, he was their Betty Crocker," said corporate governance expert Nell Minow of GovernanceMetrics International. "They have to replace him in five different ways."

"They need somebody who's going to stir the pot," said Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, Professor at the Yale School of Management.

Nell Minow also told Bloomberg last January:
"This board has acted too much over the years as an operating division of the company, not the representatives of the company.... The board has been very weak at this company in regard to compensation and back-dated stock options.... I want the board to say: 'here's what we're going to do in one month or two months about a CEO succession plan .'"

You would almost think that the board is made up of a bunch of sycophants. Is that fair? I don't think so.

The board certainly doesn't jump out at me as being one of the best in America (I'd actually point you to Amazon ( AMZN) to see what I think is a tremendously qualified board). But it certainly isn't the worst -- far from it.

The complaints of stock option back-dating are certainly fair game and deserved to be called out. However, complaining about Apple's compensation -- in the wake of their phenomenal stock performance over the last 15 years -- rings hollow to me.

If you liked this article you might like

Great Expectations? Apple 8 Line Not as Long as in Past Years

Nasdaq, S&P 500 Close Higher Amid Tension With North Korea

Former Apple Supplier Imagination Technologies Reportedly Sold to Chinese Firm

Week Wasn't Bad but That's Not Necessarily Good

Cramer: Food Stocks Are Going Hungry