"The old message was 'trust Steve,' the new message has to be 'trust the team.' ... It's no longer the cult of personality." said Jim Post, a professor of corporate governance at Boston University School of Management who called for an independent chairman. "The board needs to be expanded. They need to bring on additional independent talent ... people who were not living in Steve's shadow," he said. "Much like Disney, Apple's founder was the brand. He was their Mickey Mouse, he was their Betty Crocker," said corporate governance expert Nell Minow of GovernanceMetrics International. "They have to replace him in five different ways." "They need somebody who's going to stir the pot," said Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, Professor at the Yale School of Management.Nell Minow also
"This board has acted too much over the years as an operating division of the company, not the representatives of the company.... The board has been very weak at this company in regard to compensation and back-dated stock options.... I want the board to say: 'here's what we're going to do in one month or two monthsYou would almost think that the board is made up of a bunch of sycophants. Is that fair? I don't think so. The board certainly doesn't jump out at me as being one of the best in America (I'd actually point you to Amazon ( AMZN) to see what I think is a tremendously qualified board). But it certainly isn't the worst -- far from it. The complaints of stock option back-dating are certainly fair game and deserved to be called out. However, complaining about Apple's compensation -- in the wake of their phenomenal stock performance over the last 15 years -- rings hollow to me.
about a CEO succession plan.'"