NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- Jim Cramer fills his blog on RealMoney every day with his up-to-the-minute reactions to what's happening in the market and his legendary ahead-of-the-crowd ideas. This week he blogged on:
  • Why there's still not much to like about the bank stocks;
  • why taking profits Friday made sense; and
  • why Dollar Tree was mistaken to announce a buyback.

Click here for information on RealMoney, where you can see all the blogs, including Jim Cramer's -- and reader comments -- in real time.

What About the Banks?

Posted at 1:39 p.m. EDT on Thursday, Oct. 6.

The owners of these banks seem to have stopped selling for the moment. That reinforces the fact that the selling could be related to two exogenous causes and not the short-term fundamentals.

The first cause is margin selling. I don't want to be one of those people that says, "If you read my book, Confessions of a Street Addict, you will see what I mean." But in Confessions I talk about how the end of September brought huge margin calls for me because of redemptions. I think that last drop down in the financials accelerated because of this redemption/margin selling, which should have peaked yesterday as investors were well aware of how horrible these managers performed and had their redemption notices in by the end of the month for quick withdrawals.

> > Bull or Bear? Vote in Our Poll

Second, any attempt to offer a serious Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) plan by Europe, or any plan that takes off systemic risk, makes the banks there "less good" shorts. Of course, you haven't been allowed to short those banks, so you went after these banks: Citigroup ( C), Bank of America ( BAC) and Morgan Stanley ( MS).

Those shorts need to be closed out before squeezes begin. Given that there is nothing new good about these banks, it stands to reason that the end of margin selling and the covering of European shorts are driving things higher. Doesn't hurt, by the way, that Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner reiterated on the Hill how different and stronger our banks are than theirs and all of the safeguards as now have.

I remain negative on the stocks for fundamental reasons. I don't know how to value them. Book value isn't working. There's no revenue growth. The earnings power is difficult to figure. The Federal Reserve has ruined the margins for them, and Washington trashes them daily.

What's to like?

At the time of publication, Cramer held BAC.

Content to Take Some Profits

Posted at 10:47 a.m. EDT on Friday, Oct. 7.

Can we trust any rallies that don't include the banks? I know that the market looks terrific with the Colgate ( CL) cohort and the retail sector doing terrifically. But, I think the key to this rally has been the end of the endless decline in the financials.

However, my screen has Bank of America ( BAC) and Goldman Sachs ( GS) retreating, and that's something that is not what I want to see right now.

Given that the reasons for this market rally are job growth and no European catastrophe, I would have expected the banks to go up, not down.

Make no mistake about it, an up opening followed by a quick U-turn down, then followed by an up move is real, real good.

I also think there's a better tone to the whole world a la Baltic Freight, Suezmax and rail car loading, and the jobs number.

But, I would be content to take some profits before the weekend begins. Doesn't mean that I think the market is going down.

Does mean this rally's been tremendous and I wouldn't want to overstay my welcome. We are evaluating same for Action Alerts PLUS where we have put a lot of money to work and have made a goodly amount back this week vs. the market.

At the time of publication, Cramer held BAC.

Dollar Tree's Wrong Move

Posted at 2:22 p.m. EDT on Friday, Oct. 7.

One of my favorite companies did something I am bummed about today, and I gotta squawk about it.

The company is Dollar Tree ( DLTR) and it announced a $1.5 billion buyback that I think is a not-so-hot use of capital up here after a big run.

Typically I don't want to criticize winners. I think the dollar store cohort has long been one of favorites as part of the barbell strategy of favoring the rich and the struggling as befits our rocky economy. Dollar Tree has been an outstanding stock, up 38% year to date.

Plus, it is a terrific store. My Dollar Tree in Philadelphia has become a mainstay of my existence as I like candy and it has the best candy aisle I have ever seen. I get everything from Cow Tales to Bonamo Turkish Taffy to Goetz Caramels there, not to mention the obligatory runts, and you can eat off the floor of the place, although I don't know why anyone would eat off the floor of a dollar store or any floor for that matter.

Plus, given that the company has bought in $1.9 billion worth of stock in the last eight years including more than $700 million in the last year and a half you could say the strategy's working.

But my issue is twofold. First, the stock has had a magnificent run. So why would you buy up here? Stocks aren't chronically undervalued. It is not like the market has been slighting the stock. Just the opposite. While it has 17% growth, the stock's selling at a price-to-earnings ratio of 21, which doesn't make it cheap vs. the rest of the market.

Why not wait and be opportunistic?

We have a difficult market. If the stock doesn't come in, use the free cash flow to build more stores and challenge the other dollar stores which, frankly, just aren't as nice. Second, and more importantly, why not pay a dividend? Why benefit departing shareholders with a buyback and not the existing shareholders with what could be a pretty bountiful payout that can be reinvested and build loyalty among investors? Buybacks don't build loyalty.

Look, I can see authorizing this buyback if the stock were severely undervalued in a very obvious way. But when the S&P is down high single digits for the year and your stock is up 38%? That's empirically not the right thing to do.

And if they returned the money to shareholders via a dividend that would be a sign to me that they are committed to super-long-term growth and believe in themselves. That's something that a buyback, which can be suspended at any time, doesn't do for you.

So, hats off to Dollar Tree for executing terrifically and stocking the best candy aisle around, which include the elusive purple Mike & Ikes, but come on. Pay us a dividend and we would be even more thrilled to recommend your stock and not just your stores to Cramericans everywhere.

At the time of publication, Cramer had no position in the stock mentioned.

If you liked this article you might like

Tiger Woods' Stock Is Surging at the Arnold Palmer Invitational

Tiger Woods' Stock Is Surging at the Arnold Palmer Invitational

Goldman Sachs Suggests You Rush to Put All Your Money in These S&P 500 Sectors

Goldman Sachs Suggests You Rush to Put All Your Money in These S&P 500 Sectors

JPMorgan Bondholders Just Don't Care About the Next Financial Crisis

JPMorgan Bondholders Just Don't Care About the Next Financial Crisis

Goldman Sachs Picks Solomon to Eventually Succeed Blankfein as CEO

Goldman Sachs Picks Solomon to Eventually Succeed Blankfein as CEO

Goldman's Blankfein to Quit After Abysmal Trading Year; Market Cheers

Goldman's Blankfein to Quit After Abysmal Trading Year; Market Cheers