NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- The stock of Citigroup ( C) has been unduly punished in the recent market turmoil, according to UBS analysts.

In a report Thursday, the team of analysts led by William Tanona, argue that Citi's shares have performed roughly in line with Bank of America's ( BAC), which they say is unwarranted given "the dramatic differences in fundamentals between the two companies."

The stocks of Bank of America and Citigroup have fallen 47% and 41% respectively year-to-date, more than the decline in the SPDR Select Sector Financials ETF ( XLF), which has dropped 22%.

But the analysts note that bond spreads, earnings, capital and other fundamentals tell "meaningfully different stories" when comparing the two companies.

>> Citigroup Selloff is Overdone

The stock market and bond market appears to have taken divergent views on the stock, the analysts noted.

While shares of Citigroup have raced to the bottom with BofA, the bond market has more confidence. The cost to protect against a Citigroup default increased moderately -- with credit default swaps (CDS) trading at 189 basis points over the cost of a Citigroup bond -- while BofA CDS spreads are now at 297 basis points. Spreads on JPMorgan Chase ( JPM) CDS (considered the healthiest of the big four) are trading at 115 basis points.

Meanwhile, Citi also has much less uncertainty surrounding its earnings power. "Citi is not facing questions about its capital position, the company has less exposure to rep and warranty liabilities, and has a mortgage servicing business that is roughly a third the size of BofA's," the report said.

"In our view, the market will eventually recognize that Citi is better positioned and faces far less dramatic uncertainty from large, mortgage-related liabilities than BofA. We believe this should lead to a premium multiple to BofA, which should lead to attractive relative returns for Citi shareholders," the analysts said.

Other analysts have also argued that Citigroup's selloff is overdone . "Citigroup is still viewed more in the Bank of America camp than in JPMorgan Chase camp, though I would disagree," Raymond James analyst Anthony Polini, told TheStreet last week. "It carries a higher risk perception that has more to do with its recent past. People still remember Citi as the bank that needed government support," he added.

Readers Also Like:

--Written by Shanthi Bharatwaj in New York

>To contact the writer of this article, click here: Shanthi Bharatwaj.
Disclosure: TheStreet's editorial policy prohibits staff editors and reporters from holding positions in any individual stocks.

If you liked this article you might like

SEC's Cyber-Gaffe Highlights Risk of Trump Budget Cuts at Agency

China's Banks Halt Business With North Korea Per United Nations Sanctions

Why Hurricanes Won't Force the Fed to Ditch a December Rate Hike

Fed Pares $4.5 Trillion Balance Sheet But Easy-Money Era Isn't Over

Bank Stocks Move Higher as Fed Decides to Start Unwinding Balance Sheet