Published 4/26/2011 3:21 p.m. EDT Has the rapid onslaught of commodity ETFs gone too far? Accusations over speculation and manipulation continue to fly, with ETF/ETN issuers such as U.S. Commodity Funds and Barclays serving as the complicit dealers for big-bank manipulators. Recent actions by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) reveal that regulators are serious about cracking down on some commodities vehicles. According to an article in today's Wall Street Journal, the CFTC is moving to curb mutual funds that rely on non-U.S. subsidiaries to make speculative bets on commodities and currencies. By using foreign subsidiaries, these mutual funds evade the limits of CFTC regulation. (They are, however, within the regulatory range of the SEC.) While the spectacular rise and relative youth of the ETF industry help to force it into the spotlight, the mutual fund industry is still the seasoned big brother. As the managers of large futures-backed commodity ETFs such as the United States Natural Gas Fund ( UNG) and the PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund ( DBC) have already realized, the CFTC is developing an equal zeal for regulating commodities vehicles across the board. While many futures-backed ETFs have yet to reach the critical mass necessary to put them on the CFTC's radar, the current pressure on the commodity mutual fund industry could easily extend to a growing force of commodity ETFs in the months ahead. On a personal note, today's headlines about the structure of commodity-tracking mutual funds sent a shiver down my spine. Exactly one year ago today, I wrote a blog piece that predicted that hastily enforced CFTC regulations could push ETF issuers to restructure funds abroad. In a post titled " U.S. Derivatives Proposal Could Send Business Abroad ," I discussed how proposed CFTC regulations could cause issuers to try to structure commodity funds beyond the reach of the CFTC, where new commodity caps could not limit the size of the vehicles. I continue to believe that coordination between U.S. agencies such as the CFTC and SEC is necessary for the effective implementation of commodity ETF regulation. How will these organizations handle a burgeoning ETF industry? For now, we can look to the battle waged in the mutual fund industry for clues. At the time of publication, Dion Money Management had no positions in the stocks mentioned.
In trading on Friday, shares of the Guggenheim China Small Cap ETF crossed above their 200 day moving average of $26.05, changing hands as high as $26.27 per share. Guggenheim China Small Cap shares are currently trading up about 0.7% on the day.
In trading on Tuesday, shares of the Guggenheim China Small Cap ETF crossed below their 200 day moving average of $26.04, changing hands as low as $25.82 per share. Guggenheim China Small Cap shares are currently trading off about 2% on the day.