NEW YORK ( ETF Expert) -- Bonds were dramatically overbought throughout the summertime. Blame it on "Fed QE2-speak" or deflationary pressure or a herd-like fear of stocks. Nevertheless, the 10-year's yield of 2.3% bordered on insanity.

By the way, kudos to those who chose intermediate bond exchange-traded funds at the start of May, and then "went away" until the start of November. Investors who executed a seasonal trade of iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond ( LQD), for instance, witnessed 8% gains over a six-month stretch.

Still, the markets giveth and the markets taketh away. The 10-year Treasury may have began the year at a 3.25% yield, and it may have slipped 100 basis points over the half-year soft patch, but it has since recovered the place it occupied at the start of 2010.

Perhaps the 10-year will close out 2011 near 4%. And the current level of 3.3% shouldn't be viewed as a distrubingly high yield. (Are you kidding me?) Indeed, it's not the present yield that should trouble anyone, but rather the quickness of the bond blowout in November and December. We're talking about a 100 basis point recovery in just six weeks!

There are at least three different camps that endeavor to explain why bond yields have risen so dramatically and so quickly. Here are a variety of ETFs to fit one or more of these particular paradigms.

Possibility No. 1 -- Bond yields soared on decidedly brighter economic expectations.

According to Goldman Sachs, U.S. consumption is conspicuously growing, industrial activity is moderately accelerating, real estate is holding firm, employment is turning positive, gross domestic product forecasts are increasing and core inflation is a non-factor. Bigger picture for GS, then? The economy is expanding at a reasonable rate.

Goldman didn't stop there, however. The research team issued an S&P forecast of 1450 for year-end 2011, and recommended overweighting cyclical sectors like technology, consumer discretionary and industrials. If you buy into the Goldman Sachs paradigm, you might want to access SPDR Select Consumer Discretionary ( XLY), SPDR Select Industrials ( XLI) or iShares DJ Technology ( IYW).

Possibility No. 2 -- Bond yields soared on U.S. deficit fears.

Forget the fact that the federal deficit has surged from $161 billion to $1.5 trillion in four years. According to deficit hawks, the yields that began to skyrocket in November 2010 reflected the bipartisan compromise on economic stimulus; that is, Bush-era tax rates would be extended for a "permanently temporary" period of two years, hundreds of billions more would be added to unemployment coffers, and none of it would be paid for by accompanying cuts in spending.

It's not that some form of economic stimulus isn't or wasn't necessary. Rather, it's the fact that neither party could agree on where to tighten the government's fiscal belt. Erskine Bowles, co-chair of Obama's deficit commission, put it this way: "I'm deeply disappointed that we have this short-term deal and it's not linked to long-term fiscal restraint."

So which ETFs might fit Bowles' paradigm? Perhaps he'd prefer nations with budget surpluses and ETFs from Chile ( ECH), South Korea ( EWY) and New Zealand ( ENZL).

Possibility No. 3 -- Bond yields soared on higher U.S. inflation

Of course, this one's all in the definition. The Federal Reserve likes the Consumer Price Index and it also likes core CPI to exclude food and energy. Yet most Americans look at the price of gasoline, coffee, health care, college, food at the grocery store and thinks, "My dollars aren't stretching as far as they used to."

Enter Peter Schiff, an outspoken financial personality who believes inflation is the reason for rising bond yields -- inflation that is instantaneously created when the Fed electronically prints money. QE2, then, would be Schiff's explanation for the sudden rise in bond yields.

However, Schiff thoroughly disputes the notion that you can exclude food and energy over time, and that anyone looking at commodity prices from metals to agriculture to oil recognizes that inflation is very real. Schiff-like thinkers should stick with resource-related assets that act as inflation hedges, from gold ( GLD) to silver ( SLV) , as well as a dollar bearish fund like PowerShares Dollar Bearish ( UDN).
Disclosure Statement: ETF Expert is a website that makes the world of ETFs easier to understand. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial and/or its clients may hold positions in ETFs, mutual funds and investment assets mentioned. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert website. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships. You may review additional ETF Expert at the site.