(Solar story updated for Credit Suisse downgrade of solar sector)
NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- Investors are stepping off the gas after a healthy run for the solar sector in the latter part of 2010. Few of the solar supply-chain points have been getting much new investor money as a result of beat-and-raise quarters. Is there a way to play solar on a sector basis as opposed to company-specific basis that might give investors a read into more protected strategies even in a slowing market?
SATC). SatCon shares are up in the past month by 10%, though year-to-date, the rise in SatCon shares is at a level less than half the 118% rise in shares of Power-One. At a more general level, there are arguments made that inverter companies are more defensive plays than other companies in the solar supply chain, because they will absorb less of a declining average sales price dynamic than, for example, module makers where commoditization of product is much more advanced as a trend. Still, at some point, pricing and margins can't be defended if a market enters into a major glut situation. This is what IMS Research is predicting for the inverter space in a new report. IMS Research estimates that inverter capacity will reach 30 GW by the end of 2010, and inverter companies are adding capacity of 40% for 2011. The overall PV market is expected to be flat in 2010, though, and the key market of Germany could be down by several gigawatts. IMS Research argues in its new report that it seems likely that double ordering by panicky customers in 2010 has set up inverter companies for a big fall. Inverter suppliers will begin to see major order cancellations and large price drops in early 2011. A slow first quarter, when seasonality kicks in with the German winter, and the overhang of excess supply from the end of 2010, could lead to intense pricing pressure in the inverter space. In the solar module market, whether the company reporting was First Solar ( FSLR), focused increasingly on its solar project pipeline, or Chinese solar module upstart Solarfun Power ( SOLF), the response has been the same from investors: a selloff.
SPWRA) have major exposure -- and the Treasury cash grant program in the U.S. heading for expiration at the end of 2010 -- which led First Solar to start building a project it hasn't even sold yet -- the project pipeline play in solar is full of risks, beyond the inevitable project delays, lumpiness of revenue bookings, and margin deterioration. At a more basic level of debate about the module market is whether the Chinese solar model of spurning any project acquisitions and focusing on one-off module sales based on driving costs lower and lower will be the winning strategy. On the other hand, if the European residential market falls off a cliff in terms of pricing and other markets don't make up the slack, solar module makers might be better off with a defensive project pipeline into which they can sell modules. If the sector is oversupplied, better to have a captive sales channel, or so the thinking goes. Polysilicon prices were at all-time lows in 2010, too, leading to a greater cost advantage for the Chinese module makers. That advantage is going away in 2011, and cost-cutting initiatives will have to be more organic. More Chinese module makers are ramping up internal production of polysilicon, such as Yingli Green Energy ( YGE) and LDK Solar ( LDK), but it's a race against the clock in terms of ramping up polysilicon production versus spot market buying and long-term contract purchases. All bets seem to be off headed into 2011, yet if there's one group within solar that's got the advantage right now, it's been the input players, wafer companies like ReneSola ( SOL) and LDK Solar, with wafer pricing as tight as can be. JA Solar ( JASO), likewise, has benefited from tight supply in the cell market. JA Solar and ReneSola both sold off this week after beat-and-raise quarters. Yet LDK Solar is up 34% in the past month, and even after falling from a new 52-week high reached on Tuesday, it's showing the resurgence of at least one formerly out-of-favor input player. In LDK's case, it may have as much to do with its ever-risky balance sheet being less of a concern to investors right now, as it does the input pricing strength. These companies, including LDK, are also moving up the chain of vertical integration as the short-term input pricing strength isn't seen as a long-term way to sustain earnings in solar. Wafer pricing, in particular, is expected to not see conditions like it saw in 2010 in the next year. Input costs are expected to hit the less vertically integrated solar module companies in the fourth quarter, before the pricing peak ends. JA Solar has forever been nagged by bear arguments that as a middle man it will ultimately get squeezed by its reliance on cell pricing strength. LDK Solar has plans to produce 800 megawatts of modules next year. ReneSola has plans to increase module shipments by 48% next year. LDK sold just over 90 megawatts of modules in the third quarter and has plans for sales of roughly 120 MW to 130MW of modules in the fourth quarter. Are these input players on the road to vertical integration headed for better blended margins, or are they simply being overaggressive given potential overcapacity in 2011?
Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.