Woody's Big Win (or Dov's Dumb Defeat)Thanks to a CEO gone Bananas putting up a silly Annie Hall billboard, the director of Take the Money and Run is doing exactly that. American Apparel ( APP) agreed to pay Woody Allen $5 million to settle a lawsuit over the company's use of his image on advertisements, Allen said on Monday. Allen sued the U.S. clothing company over a year ago seeking more than $10 million in damages after his image was featured without his consent on billboards in New York and Los Angeles. The case was set for trial this week with Allen expected to testify. The billboards, which were taken down after a week's viewing in 2007, used a frame from Allen's film "Annie Hall" depicting the actor and director as a Hasidic Jew, complete with long beard, side curls and black hat. Allen's lawyers called the ads a "blatant misappropriation" and commercial use of his image. American Apparel's renegade CEO Dov Charney, however, argued the billboards were intended as a parody. How that parody would help Charney's sell more racy clothing, we aren't exactly sure. But Charney remained defiant even in defeat telling reporters he was "not sorry for expressing myself" and that the case was about "the dignity of ideas." Sorry Dov. There was not a lick of dignity involved in this charade, just a bad idea followed by a ton of legal fees and an even bigger bill footed by your insurance company and shareholders. Not that Charney minds showering his lawyers with shareholder dollars. Aside from this quixotic free speech crusade, Charney has kept his legal team busy for years fending off sexual harassment and wrongful termination lawsuits. To his lawyers -- and now to Woody -- Charney means only one thing: Ka-ching!. Dumb-o-meter score: 95 -- Sad to say, Charney's $5 million payout probably outgrossed Woody's last five movies.
Wyeth's Upset TummyAll the Protonix in the world won't settle the stomachache the U.S. government is about to give Wyeth ( WYE). The Justice Department on Monday accused the drugmaker of cheating Medicaid programs out of hundreds of millions of dollars by overcharging for Protonix, a drug that suppresses stomach acid. The government and more than a dozen states are seeking financial penalties against Wyeth of up to three times the amount lost by Medicaid. The government alleges Wyeth offered steep discounts to thousands of hospitals for two versions of Protonix between 2000 and 2006, according to court papers. But then Wyeth allegedly hid that information causing Medicaid programs throughout the country to pay much more for these drugs than they should have. Manufacturers of brand-name drugs are required by law to offer the same rebates to state Medicaid programs that they provide to other customers. Medicaid is the U.S. health program for low income families. The two whistleblowers who filed the original suits must now be feeling pretty good with Uncle Sam on their side. They would be entitled to some share of the sum if a settlement is reached with the Madison, N.J.-based company. On the other side of the river, New York-based Pfizer ( PFE - Get Report), which is trying to swallow Wyeth in a $60 billion deal slated to close later this year, is certainly watching the headlines with acute indigestion. Predictably, a Wyeth spokesman defended the company's pricing plan saying it believes its "calculations were correct" and that the company intends to "defend itself vigorously in these actions." Now that's chutzpah. The government has whistleblowers on its side. And still Wyeth is whistling past the graveyard. Even when it is likely to get buried. Dumb-o-meter score: 90 -- If Wyeth wanted to steal money from the government, it should have just become a bank and applied for TARP funds.
Congress Goes Gun CrazyA credit card can slay your savings account while a concealed weapon can kill a grizzly bear. Apparently Congress doesn't see the difference. Both Houses of Congress overwhelmingly passed a bill this week making it tougher for credit card issuers to raise fees and interest rates. President Obama pushed for such legislation for weeks in order to get it to his desk by Memorial Day. One enterprising senator, however, took Obama's figurative gun to the head of Congress a little too literally. Sen. Tom Coburn (R, Okla.) inserted an amendment to the credit card bill that allows concealed, loaded guns in national parks and wildlife refuges. The measure reverses a federal judge's decision in March to block a rule change by former President George W. Bush, who tried to allow park visitors to carry concealed weapons. In our humble opinion, it seems less than sporting to hunt an unarmed Yogi Bear with an assault rifle. And allowing a would-be assassin the additional advantage of hiding his AK-47 only increases the unevenness of the match-up. Nevertheless, Coburn sees things differently, calling his legislative end-run a genuine step to protect the Second Amendment. In fact, Coburn's ploy is likely to succeed. Obama has had the credit card companies in his crosshairs since his presidential campaign and may not get another chance to pull the trigger. He stepped up his harsh rhetoric this year after media reports emerged detailing how firms were doubling and tripling their charges to customers, including those with good credit. In a White House meeting in April, Obama directly applied pressure to executives from card issuers and servicers including Bank of America ( BAC - Get Report), JPMorgan Chase ( JPM), Citigroup ( C - Get Report), Wells Fargo ( WFC - Get Report), Visa ( V), Mastercard ( MA), Capitol One Financial ( COF), American Express ( AXP), Discover Financial Services ( DFS), as well as several other firms. We say Congress should only conjoin guns and financial services in legislation to deter bank robbers. But we'll defend to the death Coburn's right to make everybody else look dumb. Dumb-o-meter score: 85 -- For the record, the Five Dumbest Lab wholly supports the right to arm bears. .
Alternative Energy's AgonyThe Wall Street hype machine lifted alternative energy stocks sky-high. Sad to say, the sun is fast setting on ethanol and solar stocks. Pacific Ethanol ( PEIX - Get Report), the largest West Coast-based producer and marketer of ethanol, said Monday that subsidiaries that own its four ethanol production facilities filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The Sacramento, Calif.-based company said that certain lenders have agreed to debtor-in-possession financing of up to $20 million so that the plant subsidiaries can meet customer obligations related to ongoing operations. Pacific Ethanol went public to much hoopla in March 2005, partly due to the company's high-profile backer, Microsoft ( MSFT - Get Report) founder Bill Gates. The stock surged from $10 to more than $40 in May 2006 as politicians pushed biofuel's potential, and unwittingly, corn prices, sky-high. Falling oil prices and oversupply, however, depressed ethanol prices and margins. By 2008, the company was bleeding cash and Gates was feverishly selling off his shares. On Monday, prior to calling it quits, Pacific Ethanol reported a first-quarter loss of $23.9 million on revenue of $86.7 million. The company won't have to worry about quarterly reports anymore. It now trades around 36 cents a share, joining fellow ethanol high-flyer turned fast-faller VeraSun in the bankruptcy courts. At least Pacific Ethanol can take heart that it was not the only alternative energy stock stung this week. Investors also revisited the Icarus-like stories of a pair of high profile solar stocks. China's JA Solar Holdings ( JASO), which went public in February 2007, reported a wider-than-expected quarterly net loss on Tuesday and warned revenues would miss its 2009 target, sending its shares down 3% to $3.21. Last year, the stock traded seven times its current price. Its smaller rival Solarfun Power Holdings ( SOLF) not only posted a loss for the quarter, but lost its CEO as well. Solarfun Chief Executive Harold Hosken announced his resignation this week. Shares in JA Solar now trade around $6, down from $25 a year ago. Both companies make products that turn sunlight into electricity. But that has not been the problem for the pair of alternative energy players. What they really needed was a way to turn publicity into profits. Dumb-o-meter score: 75 -- Green energy stocks are turning trader's screens deep red..