Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said Tuesday that no other bailout has made him "angrier" than that of insurance giant American International Group ( AIG), but he added that the mammoth rescue plan was necessary to prevent mass chaos in the financial markets.

Before the Senate Budget Committee on Tuesday, Bernanke explained that AIG's collapse would have hurt not only the insurer, but its counterparties, competitors, the broad markets and taxpayers. If the firm failed, he said, it would have cost the global financial markets "trillions of dollars" and the government probably would not have recovered its massive investment.

The Treasury Department announced a new $30 billion credit facility for AIG on Monday as the company reported the biggest loss on record for any company. AIG had already received up to $150 billion in government support, and the Fed and Treasury eased terms on repayments to keep the struggling firm afloat.

Analysis
Discussion
Stock Rating

But during a tense questioning session in which Congress members launched harsh questions criticizing the bailout plan, Bernanke said that "nothing has made me angrier" than the way AIG operated before the emergency rescue. He characterized the firm as one that used regulatory loopholes to operate as a full financial services firm with hedge-fund qualities, rather than a plain-vanilla insurer.

But he still defended the Treasury and Fed's efforts to stabilize the financial markets, noting that inaction, or a weaker, less comprehensive rescue of major financial institutions, would have extended the financial crisis longer and cost taxpayers more.

When asked by a senator whether the U.S. will have a long, drawn-out recession similar to that of Japan in the 1990s, he assured legislators that this would not be the case.

"The Japanese mistake was not acting quickly enough or aggressively enough," said Bernanke, "and that's not our problem."

Do you support the government's plan to give even more financial aid to AIG?

Yes. The company must be supported to keep the financial system from collapsing.
Yes. But the government needs to address the company's problems more quickly.
No. The company needs to sort out its issues without more funds.
No. Taxpayers have had enough of this. If it fails, it fails.

If you liked this article you might like

What's Behind the Hound of Hades' Stock Market Rampage

What's Behind the Hound of Hades' Stock Market Rampage

Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq Post New Records as Senate Reaches Deal to End Shutdown

Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq Post New Records as Senate Reaches Deal to End Shutdown

Closing Bell: LIVE MARKETS BLOG

Closing Bell: LIVE MARKETS BLOG

Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq Shake Off Government Shutdown to Trade Higher

Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq Shake Off Government Shutdown to Trade Higher

Investors Are Really Confident These Days: LIVE MARKETS BLOG

Investors Are Really Confident These Days: LIVE MARKETS BLOG