The latest setback for RIM is likely to be the one that forces a settlement in the long-running dispute, says David Schamens, partner with Invictus Funds. "I think the market wants this uncertainty out of the way. If it is, the stock might really rip," says Schamens, whose fund has no position in RIM. Shutting down the service wouldn't be in anyone's interest, says Ovum's Entner. "The worst case scenario is that existing users won't be forced to shut down, but there might be an injunction on selling to new subscribers," says Entner. But NTP co-founder Don Stout says he will pursue an injunction if that's what it takes to get RIM to recognize its legal obligation. "Here is a company that's a willful infringer and they don't want to pay us a dime," says Stout. "And if they refuse to pay us a dime, they are going to get shut down. We have no choice but to keep them shut down until they choose to take a license." Jeff Neuburger, a patent attorney with Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner in New York, says Wednesday's court action "puts RIM in a very difficult position." "They don't have a lot of options available to them," says Neuburger. From a legal perspective, "I don't see a lot of hope for them on the horizon," he says. But RIM's statement Wednesday noted that the Supreme Court recently decided to hear an appeal in another high-profile patent dispute, that between eBay ( EBAY) and MercExchange. Neil Smith, a patent attorney with Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton in San Francisco, points to that case. At issue in eBay-MercExchange is whether courts should by default issue injunctions against patent infringers, particularly in cases where the patent holder is a mere holding company -- not an operating business that actually uses the patents. Even if the Supreme Court does not hear RIM's case directly, it could delay the enforcement of any injunction until it makes a ruling on eBay, Smith says. The Supreme Court's decision to hear the eBay case "provides a ray of hope [to RIM] of a substantial delay and a different result," says Smith. Jay Somaney, a hedge fund manager at TSG Capital Group whose firm has no position in RIM, expects to see a settlement but says the bill may be larger than investors expect. Somaney, whose firm sold its RIM puts Wednesday, believes RIM may end up paying NTP north of $1 billion on top of what he calls stiff licensing fees. He says those fees will force analysts to bring down their earnings projections for coming years. "You buy on future earnings, and right now, earnings are not predictable," says Somaney. "At the moment there's too much uncertainty. And what we know thus far, going forward can only mean further bad news for RIM." Schamens thinks the lawsuit has helped obscure other problems for RIM. Specifically, the competition is increasing in the company's wireless email business, helped along by new technology, such as faster wireless connections, he says. That's why even if RIM's stock jumps on news of a settlement, Schamens thinks it is likely to fall as time passes. The company recently had to cut subscriber-growth projections for two coming quarters. "Once you have bad news, there's usually more to come," Schamens says. "I'm a firm believer in that. You don't want to be in these stocks when bad news starts to come out after years of good news."
Even though AT&T tried a last-minute bribe of promising 5,000 new U.S. jobs to help gain support for the deal, the Justice Department filed a complaint to fight the combination of the nation's No. 2 and No. 4 wireless carriers.