PCM FundFind Ratings Reports
- Last Ratings Update:06/30/2016
- Price as of 06/30/2016 :$9.72
- Net Assets:$123.23 Million
- Peer Rank:15 of 16
- Investment Rating:C
We rate PCM Fund at C. Positive factors that influence this rating include a low price volatility. The fund invests approximately 98% of its assets in bonds and may be considered for investors seeking a General Mortgage strategy.
POSITIVES AND RISKS
Total return ranks below peers over the last three years. The PCM Fund has returned an annual rate of 8.01% since inception. More recently, the fund has generated a total return of 6.67% in the last five years, 4.15% in the last three years, and 7.07% in the last year. How does that compare to other equity funds? In the last five years, it has outperformed 55% of them. It has also outpaced 46% of its competitors on a three year basis and 74% of them over the last year for the period ending 6/30/2016. On a year to date basis, PCM has returned 10.89%.
Downside risk has been below average. PCM has a draw down risk of -26.94%, which is the largest price decline experienced over the last three years. This fund has a three year standard deviation of 11.0%. This fund has had a low level of volatility in its monthly performance over the last 36 months. As of 6/30/2016, the fund was trading at a price of $9.72, which is 1.8% below its 52-week high of $9.90 and 3.4% above its 52-week low of $9.40.
High expense ratio hinders performance. On total assets of $123.24 million, PCM maintains a high expense ratio compared to its General Mortgage peers of 2.26% to cover all operating costs. Brokerage costs for the fund to buy and sell shares are not included in the expense ratio. As PCM is a closed end fund, it has no front end or back end load.
Manager tenure is a net positive but performance record lags managerial peers. Substandard fund managers tend to be replaced, so a long tenure is usually a good sign that a fund is achieving its objectives. The PCM Fund has been managed by Daniel J. Ivascyn for the last 15 years. Over that period, the manager was able to capture more actual gains in excess of the expected return than just 40% of other fund managers.