Hillary Clinton laid out her agenda for technology and innovation this week. Much of what she's proposed would be a win for tech and telecom companies, but there would be losers, too.

This week, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee unveiled a series of proposed technology initiatives, including expanding internet access, establishing rules to support innovation and improving the government's use of technology.

"It is one of our biggest assets, and I want it to be democratized," Clinton said while visiting Denver tech education and co-working space Galvanize Tuesday, according to a transcript released by her campaign. "I want more people in more places to feel that their future lies in STEM [science, technology, engineering and math], in technology, in helping to create the jobs that we're going to attract."

Those who track these things seem to approve. Peter Leroe-Muñoz, vice president of technology and innovation policy at the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, said Clinton's proposal "conveys a vested interest in the digital economy and understands the importance of access to information and a fast internet." Todd Thibodeaux, president and CEO of the Computing Technology Industry Association, said the tech industry is "encouraged" and looks forward to "increased conversations on technology from both candidates." TechNet president and CEO Linda Moore said this "proves she gets it."

Much of what Clinton laid out in her 14-page technology platform is a continuation of President Obama's policies, said John Beahn, counsel on communications and national security at law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. But some of it goes farther.

"The proposal assumingly wants to broaden a number of Obama initiatives on telecommunications and other related policies," he said.

"She gets that innovation is really important and that it's an asset that America has and that she's going to nurture it," said Karen Kornbluh, former U.S. ambassador to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Kornbluh, who worked in both the Bill Clinton and Obama administrations and now informally advises Secretary Clinton's campaign, characterized the agenda as pro-growth, pro-innovation and pro-market.

Here are three major parts of Clinton's tech agenda, with winners and losers for each: 

1. Broadband, WiFi Everywhere

Winners: Telecoms

The former first lady has pledged to deliver universal broadband to all American households by 2020, something her predecessors have sought to achieve as well. George W. Bush in 2004 pledged to expand internet accessibility across all of America by 2007, and the Obama administration has set similar objectives.

While broadband penetration is largely complete in cities and suburbs, in remote, rural areas that are more difficult and, in turn, more expensive to reach, that's not the case. Part of Clinton's plan to change that is to establish a $25 billion Infrastructure Bank to develop public-private partnerships for broadband and get internet everywhere as fast as possible.

Telecom companies like Verizon (VZ) - Get Report , AT&T (T) - Get Report and Comcast (CMCSA) - Get Report , which provide broadband internet services, would likely benefit from access to financing to build infrastructure to more clients they haven't yet been able to reach.

Losers: Telecoms?

Another part of Clinton's internet everywhere agenda might actually hurt some of the companies her broadband expansion initiative helps.

Part of her technology platform is to expand free WiFi in schools, libraries, transit systems and other public spaces. Wireless carriers, including Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile (TMUS) - Get Report , might not mind offloading some traffic off of their networks, but not to the point that consumers will start to downsize their data plans. Moreover, they might object if the $25 billion needed for the Infrastructure Bank starts to appear by way of taxes on their customers' bills.

They might also not be in love with Clinton's pledge to defend net neutrality, which mandates that internet service providers and governments must treat all internet data the same. The Federal Communications Commissionapproved net neutrality rules in February despite protests from AT&T, Comcast, Verizon and other broadband companies that argue the rules are too heavy-handed and hamper investment and innovation.

Comcast is a holding in Jim Cramer's Action Alerts PLUS Charitable Trust Portfolio. See how Cramer rates the stock here. Want to be alerted before Cramer buys or sells CMCSA? Learn more now.

2. Immigration

Winners: Facebook, Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, and more

Clinton's stance on immigration is a win for tech companies gunning to hire and retain top talent from around the globe.

In her list of initiatives for the tech industry, Clinton says she would "staple" a green card to STEM masters and PhD diplomas for foreign students from accredited institutions, a move aimed at keeping top tech talent who learn in the U.S. in the country.

Immigration reform has been a major point of focus for many in the tech community. Facebook (FB) - Get Report CEO Mark Zuckerberg in 2013 launched FWD.us, a lobbying group dedicated primarily to the issue. Others involved in the organization include Yahoo (YHOO) CEO Marissa Mayer, Microsoft (MSFT) - Get Report founder Bill Gates and Dropbox CEO Drew Houston.

Alphabet's (GOOGL) - Get Report Google is another winner here, too. In 2013, Laszlo Bock, senior vice president of people operations at the company, spoke out in support of high-skilled immigration reform, in a post calling immigrants "a powerful force for entrepreneurship and innovation at every level." Last year, Alphabet executive chairman Eric Schmidt called on Congress to separate high-skilled immigration reform from comprehensive reform.

Others who have spoken out in favor of immigration reform in the past include Intel (INTC) - Get Report , Qualcomm (QCOM) - Get Report and Texas Instruments (TXN) - Get Report .

Losers: Anti-Immigration Advocates

Clinton's Republican rival Donald Trump has focused much of his campaign on stopping immigration to the U.S., legal and illegal alike. Clinton's whole staple-a-green-card-to-a-degree plan isn't exactly what he has in mind.

The presumptive GOP nominee has offered up conflicting stances on the H-1B visa program, which many U.S. companies utilize to employ foreign workers in specialty occupations, many of which are in tech, engineering and science. Oh his campaign website, Trump says he will lift the prevailing wage for such visas in order to force firms to give more jobs to American workers and that he will require companies to hire Americans first. As The Washington Post pointed out, Trump has at times appeared more moderate on H-1B visas, though after waffling at a debate earlier this year he sought to clarify his plan to "end forever" the use of the program for cheap labor and require American workers be hired first.

Trump isn't the only Republican who would be disappointed with Clinton's proposed immigration reform. Texas Senator Ted Cruz, as part of his presidential platform, called for the suspension of all H-1B visas for 180 days for an investigation and audit as well as a number of measures to make legal immigration tougher.

Facebook and Alphabet are holdings in Jim Cramer's Action Alerts PLUS Charitable Trust Portfolio. See how Cramer rates the stock here. Want to be alerted before Cramer buys or sells FB or GOOGL? Learn more now.

3. Open Internet Abroad

Winners: Freedom

As secretary of state, Clinton demonstrated an interest in internet freedom not only in America but worldwide. In a famed speech on the topic in 2010, Clinton warning against "threats to the free flow of information" abroad and calling freedom of expression the most obvious freedom to face challenges with the spread of new technologies.

"Now, ultimately, this issue isn't just about information freedom; it is about what kind of world we want and what kind of world we will inhabit. It's about whether we live on a planet with one internet, one global community, and a common body of knowledge that benefits and unites us all, or a fragmented planet in which access to information and opportunity is dependent on where you live and the whims of censors," she said.

In her current campaign proposal, Clinton reiterates her commitment to fighting for open internet abroad. She names China and Russia as countries that seek to create "a balkanized internet run by governments" that she will stand against. Cuba's internet rules are likely on her radar, too.

Clinton's pledge to fight for open internet abroad would likely benefit tech companies that regularly encounter friction when marketing their products and services around the globe. Were she able to make advancements on that front in a country like China, which blocks access to Twitter (TWTR) - Get Report , Facebook and Google and has recently clamped down on Apple (AAPL) - Get Report , it might be impactful for them.

"The more people can get onto the internet, the better for all of those companies," said Beahn.

Losers: Reality

As much as Clinton may want to expand open internet globally, she can't force foreign governments to bend to her will. In other words, a President Clinton probably won't result in an entirely Google-friendly China or a WiFi-filled Cuba.

The tech community -- in the U.S. and worldwide -- are likely more comfortable with Clinton's internet attitude than they are with Trump's. He's mused about "closing parts of the internet."

Twitter and Apple are holdings in Jim Cramer's Action Alerts PLUS Charitable Trust Portfolio. See how Cramer rates the stock here. Want to be alerted before Cramer buys or sells TWTR or AAPL? Learn more now.