Skip to main content

Courtesy of ZeroHedge

Amid a collapse in global bond yields (to record lows) and soaring aggregate volumes of central-bank-created negative-yielding debt, at least one big bond shop is dumping sovereigns.

Image placeholder title

“We’re a lot more defensive,” warned PIMCO's Daniel Ivascyn, group CIO at the massive bond manager, noting that after the best year-to-date performance since 2003, the fund is paring its positions in government debt on fears that a breakthrough in US-China trade talks could trigger a violent sell-off.

“Even if we get a narrow trade agreement [between the US and China] we could see a pretty powerful snapback in yields.”

However, as The FT reports, while PIMCO is lightening up on their positions in the UK and European bond markets, it is reducing exposure to the US government bond markets less. 

“We like the US market more – it still has more room to rally in a global flight to safety,” Mr Ivascyn said.
“But it wouldn’t take much of an uptick in inflation to cause a meaningful repricing.”

Ivascyn may appear more constructive on growth and inflation but, as FT notes, he tempers his enthusiasm by noting that,

“We think we’ll at best get a partial agreement on trade, and this friction will be with us for a long time.”

And one could argue bonds are more in line with the depressionary signals than stocks currently…

Image placeholder title

It appears investors are buying any dip (in price) in USTs for now…

Image placeholder title

His greatest fear, which is likely driving the decision to dump European debt faster than US debt, is simple – unorthodox policy mania…

“We think it’s premature to declare inflation to be dead…”
“We could still see more unorthodox policies, like ‘helicopter money’.”

PIMCO's words (and actions, we presume), echo a report from BlackRock, co-authored by Philipp Hildebrand, Stanley Fischer and Jean Boivin, pointing out that central banks have limited firepower left in their monetary armory, and that fiscal policy is constrained by still-high debt levels. The trio concluded that “unprecedented policies will be needed to respond to the next economic downturn”. The report added:

“Without a clear framework in place, policymakers will inevitably find themselves blurring the boundaries between fiscal and monetary policies… This threatens the hard-won credibility of policy institutions and could open the door to uncontrolled fiscal spending.”

Will it be different this time?