Now you see it. Now you don't.
In today's market time, where 10 minutes seem to bring what 10 years used to, last week's rout is likely little more than a distant memory.
Don't forget so soon. Believe it or not, that red-flashing ticker handed you more than a scare and a stomachache. Not only did it offer a valuable (if unwelcome) reminder that there are no guarantees on Wall Street, the selloff also gives a black-and-white (or green-and-red) picture of an investment's potential future risk.
Oh yes, we could rely on the often incomprehensible -- and almost always imperfect -- measures like beta and alpha to try to figure that out. But let's be honest: When was the last time you looked at those numbers before buying?
A far better way of getting a sense of your investment's riskiness is an answer to this question: How does it perform in a correction, or even a crash? What happens when the markets go down, not up?
It's been a while since we could ask that question. You have to go back to the last quarter of 1998. And times may be different now. Then, the bull just took a breather, and within two months, was running full-speed ahead. And that was with the help of the
slicing interest rates. Few expect
& Co. to be so accommodating today.
But if you want to predict the pulse of your fund or stock during down times, you may have trouble. Don't expect your fund firm to trumpet how it performed during April's storm. And the major rating companies generally offer results measured in round quarters or years.
So here's a list worth keeping -- from the market high of March 10 through last Friday's free fall, these are the best among the biggies -- that is, among the funds you likely hold.
A couple of things to note: When you're looking at past returns, 1999 is ancient history. Much more revealing are trailing one-year returns, which tell you a whole lot more because they include both faces of this Jekyll and Hyde market. Check out how the market mayhem ate away at your gains. I did a double-take when I saw
Janus Twenty's one-year number -- a meager 12.6%, compared with 1999 calendar-year returns of nearly 65%. Same goes for
Janus fund -- one-year trailing returns of 16% compared with 1999's 47%. Both of these aggressive, tech-taut funds fell quite a bit when compared with their peers. Janus Twenty went from the top 10% of large growth funds in 1999 to the bottom half of the category for the past 12 months.
See these previous stories for lists of the
worst-performing diversified funds during this period. I asked
to run a slightly longer list. What's fascinating about the best performers is that some familiar names whose obituaries had pretty much been written by the momentum guys are very much alive and kicking. Among the top 25 performers:
UAM Clipper Focus, which gained 14% during the last few weeks, a big improvement over its 4% loss over the past 12 months and
Oakmark, which recently lost Bob Sanborn as longtime manager because of his adherence to a strict value philosophy, was back among the living too -- gaining 14% vs. a 22% loss over the last year.
Bottom line: You've now got a good barometer, one you should remember as you buy or sell funds, whether we end up riding the bull again or trying to hide from the bear.
Brenda Buttner's column, Under the Hood, appears Thursdays. At time of publication, Buttner held no positions in any securities mentioned in this column, although holdings can change at any time. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks or funds. While she cannot provide investment advice or recommendations, Buttner appreciates your feedback at