Skip to main content

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Most investors know rising interest rates can undermine bond prices, but just how bad can it be? With rates likely to drift up this year, it's important to know.

While bonds do indeed perform poorly in this kind of environment, the damage isn't always as bad as many investors expect, according to a study by Morningstar , the market-data firm.

"The risk of rising rates is real and could be costly if the magnitude of the move proves large," Morningstar cautions. "And even if rates stay steady, bonds no longer benefit from the tailwind of falling yields, which spurred impressive gains since the 1980s. Nevertheless, we don't believe investors should jettison them from portfolios altogether."

The general effect of rising rates is easy to understand. If you paid $1,000 for a bond yielding 3%, it would pay you $30 a year. If, a year later, new bonds selling for $1,000 were to yield 6%, no one would pay the full $1,000 for your older bond. Its price would fall to $500, so its $30 annual payment would equal the same 6% paid by new bonds.

That would be pretty devastating, but in real life other factors reduce the damage. For one thing, the possibility of higher rates may be worked into the price of a bond when you or your mutual fund buys it, so that the reality of higher rates has less impact later.  Also, those $30 coupon payments could be reinvested in newer bonds with higher yields.

Also see: What to Do With Your Finances While 2014 Is Still New>>

For a real-life look, Morningstar examined the performance from 1946 through last September of the Ibbotson Associates SBBI Intermediate-Term Government Bond Index, a gauge of the broad government bond market. The study looked at the index's total return in periods when rates rose by at least 10 basis points, or 0.1 percentage points.

There were 64 such periods, with rates rising by 16 to 468 basis points over two to 21 months. Overall, the index returned 22 basis points during these periods. While nothing to brag about, that's "hardly the bloodbath some might have expected," Morningstar reports.

The largest loss was 5.53% from September 1993 to December 1994, when the rates rose by 297 basis points. At the other extreme was a 5.87% gain from November 1976 to June 1978, as rates climbed by 250 basis points. For all 64 periods, the median after-inflation return was a loss of 1.49%.

TheStreet Recommends

A closer look showed that "real" yields, which subtract the loss to inflation, are especially hard hit when rates are low at the start of the period and inflation is unusually high in the year before rates begin to rise. When rates are high at the start, returns are not hurt as badly regardless of what inflation does. This makes sense, because higher yields provide a bigger cushion for absorbing the damage from inflation.

Also, the larger the rate increase relative to yields at the start of the period, the greater the damage to overall returns. That, too, makes sense: a 1 percentage point rate increase would be a big change if yield started at 3%, but not so big if it started at 7%.

Also see: How to Tell If You Should Do a Roth Conversion>>

Today's conditions present a mixed bag. Inflation is low, and if it stayed that way would help mitigate the damage from rising rates. But rates are also very low, so a relatively small gain in basis points would be a big percentage of the starting rate, hitting bond prices pretty hard.

So what should investors do?

Morningstar advises against selling all bond holdings in favor of cash or stocks, arguing that rate changes are very hard to forecast, that cash yields almost nothing and that stocks are generally riskier than bonds. Instead, Morningstar recommends focusing on bonds' role as a less-volatile holding that diversifies a portfolio -- a benefit that survives when even rates are rising.

But to strengthen the bond portion of a portfolio, Morningstar recommends a look at corporate bonds. Because they start with higher yields than government bonds, they may well be hurt less by rising rates.

Another strategy, says Morningstar, would be to increase holdings of Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS, a form of government bond that has periodic principal increases to keep pace with inflation. TIPS values can be undermined by rising rates, but not by the rising inflation that often accompanies rising rates.

"Bonds still retain their utility as portfolio stabilizers, and prudent allocations to credit-sensitive and inflation-hedging sectors could help minimize damage caused by a rising-rate environment," Morningstar says.