Stock funds are sagging and fund investors are bailing. This could be the beginning of a fairly vicious cycle.

Other Junk

Questioning the Buy-and-Hold Strategy

No Redemption: Growth Funds Could Crush the Market

Naming Names: Would Be Hit Hardest by Redemptions

The Ima Loser Fund Club

The Low-Maintenance Portfolio

In a continuing trend, stock funds lost more money to redemptions than they took in last week. In the five trading days ended Thursday, stock funds were in net redemptions to the tune of $11.9 billion, according to the latest figures from liquidity tracker

. While these numbers represent early estimates, and the firm did have to reduce its outflow estimates from February, they do illustrate investors still slackening appetite for stock funds.

This redemption trend is worth watching whether you own stocks directly or through funds, because it could have repercussions beyond the fund world. Here's how: Steady redemptions could send tech and growth stocks lower if growth managers are forced to sell their top picks and raise cash to meet redemptions -- a scenario raised in this column on

March 2.

Over the five trading days ended March 15, bond and balanced funds, which combine stock and bond holdings, took in $400 million more than they lost to redemptions, while money market or cash funds took in a whopping $6.8 billion. This movement of cash from stock funds and into bond and cash funds is becoming familiar.

Last year, stock funds averaged a $4.7 billion weekly in-flow according to, but this year that's down to just $800 million. At the same time, average flows to bond and money market funds are sharply higher than last year's.

Rising interest in bond and cash funds is driven in part by investors' efforts to stockpile cash to pay their April 15 tax bills. After all, funds paid out a record $345 billion in taxable capital-gains distributions, raising many investors' tax burdens. The previous record was $238 billion in 1999, according to the

Investment Company Institute

, the fund industry's largest trade group.

But tax maneuvering alone doesn't explain the migration of money from stock funds.

So far this month, U.S. stock funds are in net outflows by $13 billion. Over the same period a year ago, these funds took in more than $35 billion, according to On the other hand, bond and balanced funds, which are $1.1 billion in the black so far this month, were nearly $14 billion in the red during the same period a year ago.

Investors' disinterest in stock funds is surely also being driven by steep losses among growth and tech funds, which rode the sizzling tech sector to stellar returns in 1998 and 1999 and record in-flows over the past two years. But frothy valuations, slipping demand and dwindling earnings at tech shops have made these funds' tech stakes a burden. The average big-cap, mid-cap and small-cap growth funds have lost more than a third of their value over the past 12 months, according to


. It's even worse for tech-sector funds, down a stunning 61.4% over the past year.

Mutual fund cash flows follow performance, if gradually. Not surprisingly, portfolio managers who run index funds and less aggressive or value-oriented stock funds are reporting rising in-flows. The average big-cap value fund has eked out a 1.1% gain over the past 12 months, according to Morningstar.

One anecdotal but compelling barometer might be which funds investors are now researching. Last year the most widely viewed fund reports on

, a fund-tracking Web site, were routinely from shops like


, whose high-octane, tech-stuffed funds rang up fat returns in 1999.

Today the Denver firm, which has shuttered several funds and is seeing monthly outflows now, still has three funds among the site's 10-most viewed reports. But the top two are

(VFINX) - Get Report

Vanguard 500 Index fund, which inactively tracks the S&P 500 index, and

(OAKLX) - Get Report

Oakmark Select, a mid-cap value fund. The third most popular fund report is that of the

(VTSMX) - Get Report

Vanguard Total Bond Market Index fund, which tracks the

Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index


If growth funds and the tech stocks they love don't show signs of life anytime soon, it's reasonable to expect their shareholders to keep voting with their feet as they reduce their exposure to the tech sector -- still an overweighting in many portfolios. When outflows hit value funds in 1998 and 1999, managers weighed down their own stocks and funds when they had to sell shares to cash out investors. It makes sense to keep an eye on fund flows this year, since the same bleak cycle could play out among the growth and tech set.

The Junk Pile

For better or worse, fund shops are still rolling out health care and biotech sector funds, even though the sector is buckling. Thanks to a surging biotech sector, last year health funds lapped every other stock fund category, ringing up a 55.4% gain, compared with a 9.1% loss for the

S&P 500

, according to Morningstar. In a familiar pattern, investors' cash followed hot returns. The then 40-fund category took in more than $13.5 billion last year, smashing the previous record for in-flows, which was about $5 billion set in 1998.

Now that biotech stocks have cooled and the average health care fund is down a whopping 23.7% already this year, that serious dip is erasing many of last year's gains, leaving the category down 7.2% over the past 12 months.

Still, in the past 45 days four new health funds have rolled out or registered with regulators. In February the exchange-traded

iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology Index

fund and the

Turner Health & Biotech

fund were born. And this month

John Hancock Funds

launched the

John Hancock Biotechnology

fund to complement its struggling


John Hancock Life Sciences fund.


Oak Associates

, best known for its tech-investing acumen, filed paperwork with regulators last Thursday to launch the

Oak Health Sciences

fund on June 1. Are these funds well timed or are these funds just latent performance chasers? Time will tell.

Fund Junkie runs every Monday, Wednesday and Friday, as well as occasional dispatches. Ian McDonald writes daily for In keeping with TSC's editorial policy, he doesn't own or short individual stocks. He also doesn't invest in hedge funds or other private investment partnerships. He invites you to send your feedback to, but he cannot give specific financial advice.