Eco-Friendly Wine Picks

Which wines have the smallest "carbon footprint"?
Publish date:

Our cups runneth over this time of year.

So do our recycling bins.

The piles of empty bottles raise the issue of whether there's a greener way to package and ship wine.

Turns out that the wine industry has been slowly but steadily moving away from the heavy green bottles that have been its mainstay for longer than anyone can say. The move toward tetra paks, bag-in-a-box contraptions (which are exactly what they sound like) and even plastic bottles is spurred partly by a desire to stand out on a crowded store shelf, appeal to a new market segment or to keep quality consistent.

But there is also a definite eco-advantage to these new containers -- the wine industry is increasingly global and glass is heavy and not environmentally efficient to ship. British sommelier Garry Clark points out

in his blog that the average case of wine weighs 18 kilograms, and nearly half that weight is the bottles.

The eco-bloggers at

TriplePundit turned me on to

a great new study from the

American Association of Wine Economists that looks at the carbon footprint created by shipping bottles of wine around the world and across the U.S.

One-third of the red, white and bubbly Americans drink comes from overseas, primarily from Australia, and that portion is expected to increase as foreign purveyors push more aggressively into our growing market. Among domestic wines, 90% are made in California -- no surprise there.

The study shows that that wine's carbon footprint is influenced both by how it's shipped and the distance it travels. Surprisingly, domestic wine isn't always the greener option.

Moving wine in unrefrigerated container ships creates the fewest greenhouse gases. Refrigerated containers generate a few more. Shipping by air cargo, as small wineries might for their Web customers and club members, is the most fuel consumptive, creating 11 times as many greenhouse gases as the ships. Trains and trucks aren't nearly as emissions-intensive but still generate several times more greenhouse gases than ships.

The study's authors say that because of distance, Australian wines have already created a sizable footprint by the time they're unloaded from their cargo ships in Los Angeles. Once they move inland, the level of carbon dioxide emissions involved becomes downright discouraging. For East Coast dwellers and Midwesterners, Aussie wines are quite an indulgence, environmentally speaking. Even on the West Coast it's hard to justify the greenhouse gases, given the great wines being made all along the Pacific Coast.

But Europe isn't nearly as far as Australia, and delivering wine to the East Coast can happen primarily by ship. That changes things for some of us. The study says a wine from Bordeaux is a greener option than one trucked from Napa Valley for most people east of the Appalachians and in the Southeastern U.S. For folks further West, eco-conscious wine drinkers can stick to their American zinfandels, merlots and chardonnays.

One way to lower the energy consumption associated with shipping wine is to take it out of those glass bottles.

Tetra Pak says that with its containers, 96% of a wine's total package weight comes from the wine, a much better ratio than bottles offer. The eco-argument is that, because they're lighter and square, they can be packed more efficiently and consume far less fuel during shipping. Similar arguments can be made in favor of bag-in-a-box packaging, according to

Black Box Wines, a leading producer here.

French Rabbit and

Three Thieves are California wine makers that have generated a fair amount of

buzz and brand identity around their twist-top tetra bricks of red and white wines, which you can find in wine stores for less than $10.

Wine blogs like BoxedWineSpot report that boxed wines have been gaining

new appreciation in Australia and Europe for several years now -- they're sometimes called cask wines, which sounds a lot better -- and the wine industry

buzz has been that they'll gain more acceptance here as

better wines find their way into them.

In addition to the environmental pluses, these contraptions have a technical advantage over bottles: The plastic or aluminum bag inside the box collapses as the wine is dispensed, keeping oxygen out and the wine fresh for more than a month -- handy for those of us who dislike opening a bottle of wine for a single after-work glass.

On the disposal end of things, the box part of the bag-in-a-box is cardboard and easily recycled. Tetra paks are more problematic.

Treehugger points out that they're made of recyclable materials, which matters only if your community accepts them -- fewer than half the states have municipalities that do. Tetra Pak keeps a


But glass bottles have their own problems. Primarily, they need to be separated by color to be

made into new bottles. But brown, green and clear bottles often break while they're being collected and sorted. The shards mingle with each other and with other types of glass, and they have to be relegated to landfill or downcycled to lower-grade uses like road paving.

The boxed wines are handy and a more environmentally friendly option for holiday celebrations than laying in cases of bottled wine. But if you feel that cracking open a tetra pak during a small dinner party or letting people belly up to the cardboard cask at your next open house is a little too gauche, keep them hidden in the kitchen.

Head to


(WSM) - Get Report

or even


(TGT) - Get Report

for some stylish pitchers or decanters that will add back the celebratory panache you lose by not being able to pop a cork. The only one who will miss the bottles is the guy who picks up your recycling.

Eileen P. Gunn writes about the business of life and is the author of "Your Career Is An Extreme Sport." You can learn more about her at

her Web site.