BOSTON (TheStreet) -- Debate over buying bond funds versus individual securities is heating up again, with no shortage of warnings that a bursting "bond bubble" and inevitable rising interest rates means doom and gloom for the funds.
Chris Philips, a senior analyst in
Investment Strategy Group, doesn't buy it.
"The total bond market has only lost money in two years since 1976," he says."Think of all the periods where we had year-over-year rising interest rates, and yet we've only had two years with negative returns."
Exposure to bonds should typically creep upward as investors age and seek to minimize the risk and volatility of stocks, maintaining wealth rather than necessarily creating it.
Vanguard's target retirement funds, for example, invest a 90/10 percentage split between stocks and bonds for those with a 25-year or more investment horizon. With 20 years until retirement, they recommend an 83/17 ratio; with 10 years to go, 68/32; and a 50/50 allocation upon retirement. After retirement, their designated exposure to bonds moves even higher, to 64% at five years and 70% at 10 years out.
suggests a slightly different formula: a 5% bond allocation for an investment horizon of 20 or more years, 25% when there are five to 20 years until retirement and 35% with five years to go.
The simplicity of these equations can betray the complexities of how that allocation should be divided among bond categories.
"The next step is to ask what the allocation within the municipal or taxable market should be," Philips says. "A great place to start is looking at what the total bond market is delivering. If the allocation at the aggregate level in the bond market is, for example, 40% Treasury bonds, 20% corporate bonds and another 40% mortgage bonds, then that tends to be a pretty good place to start for someone looking to get an idea of what the market weights are. Start by looking at the broad bond market and use that as a baseline. If you are not comfortable with that -- you want more Treasuries, for example -- then you can always adjust that on your own."
Playing your preferences
Bond funds can help simplify the process of deciding exposure to various bond classes, as many of them are built with a specific purpose in mind.
For those chasing higher returns, there are various bond types to consider and funds built around them. Those in the high-yield category often target the bonds of below-investment-grade companies. These bonds can, in a best-case scenario, offer good returns. The downside is that they have the greatest likelihood of default.
Notable high-yield bond funds include
John Hancock High-Yield
, which rose 55% last year, and
BlackRock High Income
, which climbed 34%.
Concerned about rising interest rates or convinced the U.S. economy is moving in the wrong direction?
Funds that pick their bonds from global offerings, such as
family of emerging country funds, can reduce exposure to domestic interest rates and currency concerns.
Concerns about rising taxes often lead investors to municipal bonds. Several funds target this market, including
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond
iShares S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Fund
Pimco Unconstrained Bond Fund
Those worried about the impact state and local economic woes may have on munis will want to seek out broad-based funds that spread investments across multiple states and have a mix of short-, intermediate- and long-duration maturities.
Given the needed commitment in money and time, though, Philips would caution against investors going it alone. Bond funds have researchers on staff and buy cheaper through economies of scale.
"Unless you have an extraordinarily large pool of money that you are putting to work in a laddered portfolio, it can be very difficult to get a properly diversified portfolio," Philips says.
-- Reported by Joe Mont in Boston.
Get more stock ideas and investing advice on our sister site,