From the "new twist on old story" department:
Forget the takeover talk at
. At least for now. Several analysts say (and/or hope) a more likely target is (or should be)
. The New Hampshire-based company's CEO, Craig Benson, sparked the chatter (and lit a fire under his company's beaten-up stock) about three weeks ago at the
Hambrecht & Quist Technology Conference
in a speech dubbed "The Value Within." Before, during and after the speech he talked about the possibility of spinning off minority stakes in one or two units to the public. While that may not seem significant, it could also be viewed as a way of hanging a "for sale" sign on all or part of the company, or at the very least signaling to potential buyers that he's ready to deal.
And don't overlook the importance "dealing" plays in this story. Potential buyers of Cabletron, which some analysts believe include
, would almost certainly want to sell off (or have the option of not taking) pieces that don't fit with their strategies. Each of these companies, through recent acquisitions, has shown a desire to grow much larger in the networking space. "Management has to be willing to make it as clean as a transaction for the buyer as possible," says
Banc of America Securities
analyst Al Tobia. That's not something 3Com has shown a willingness to do. But it's one reason Tobia last week upgraded Cabletron to buy from hold. "I think they're going to do something," he says.
You can't help but take Tobia's upgrade seriously. He had a hold on Cabletron since 1996, and he was one of the first analysts publicly to voice concern about the company's old strategy of overstuffing the distribution channel. (Banc of America, formerly
, has done no recent underwriting for Cabletron.)
He figures Cabletron, which rose 1 3/8 yesterday to close at 12 9/16, is worth $20 per share based on market valuations of comparable companies. Others think it could be considerably higher. It depends on what Benson really wants to do. As Cabletron's biggest investor, with 19 million shares, it would appear he would want to do something, and do it soon. "He wants some money, and I imagine he knows this is not an industry where longevity is a big benefit," Tobia says. "The writing is on the wall."
However, Wall Street isn't yet convinced he will do the right thing. The stock has leapt around 35% since Benson spoke April 28. But it's still a far cry from its highs in the mid-40s in 1997. "People have taken a so-what attitude because
Cabletron is losing the fight against
," says one skeptical money manager who's long Cabletron. He isn't convinced Benson is willing to part with the company.
One thing is clear, though: The number of large, free-standing networking companies is shrinking, leaving fewer networking companies to buy.
What's uncertain is whether Benson will know a seller's market when he sees it.
Lernout & Hauspie
yesterday reported first-quarter earnings that beat sharply reduced analyst estimates. But it shouldn't be surprising: Receivables, the amount owed by customers, rose to a record 112 days from 95 days in a business where receivables are generally low. High receivables suggest a company stuffs the distribution channel with more merchandise than it can reasonably digest as a way to boost quarterly sales and earnings.
Another dollop of Delia's:
When we last
had fired its auditors and the company hadn't gotten back to me with an explanation. Today that explanation came: The company hadn't been happy with
Deloitte & Touche
Ernst & Young
as the auditor for its
unit, in preparation for its IPO. It was so happy with Ernst that it gave them the job of auditing the entire company.
Iridiot or irresponsible?:
Thanks to all who enjoyed this column's Iridiotic
. However, some readers agreed with Oscar Silva, who wrote: "As a journalist you should have learned by now that expressing your opinions can always generate emotional reactions, particularly when people lost money. Such reactions may be offensive or unfair to the author, as it could have been in this case against you, but that is no excuse for your insults.
"You owe an apology to all the readers of
. I am taking the liberty to send this letter to your editors for them to judge."
Be my guest. Investors who lost money with Iridium aren't Iridiots. Iridiots refers to Iridium investors who caused my Hostile React-O-Meter to spin outta control (outta control, I tell ya) for questioning the financials of Iridium before it fell like a, well, satellite out of the sky.
Herb Greenberg writes daily for TheStreet.com. In keeping with TSC's editorial policy, he doesn't own or short individual stocks, though he owns stock in TheStreet.com. He also doesn't invest in hedge funds or other private investment partnerships. He welcomes your feedback at
email@example.com. Greenberg also writes a monthly column for Fortune.