OK, maybe many of you don't remember the old
five-and-dimes, much less the days when anything in the store could be had for a nickel or two. But even if you've never seen a soda fountain, you should at least recognize the name, if only for the pain it's caused investors over the past few years. Nor has the point been lost on management: The company dropped the Woolworth name in favor of the unlikely
And yet neither the name change nor the company's subsequent flight from Manhattan's landmark Woolworth building is a particularly big fish in the sea of change at Venator. After all, the company has closed thousands of stores, the majority of them the original Woolworth outlets, in an effort to focus primarily on its sporting-goods market.
With more than 6,000 stores -- mainly
stores -- today's Venator is, for all intents and purposes, a sporting-goods retailer.
Perhaps the only thing that hasn't changed is the pain the stock inflicts on its investors. And I'm not talking about those who suffered the roughly 80% nose dive that began at 26 back in March 1998 and ended at less than 4 in March 1999. I am talking about those who bought into the ensuing rally which petered out at 11 one month later. Those who did not only missed out on a raging bull market, but, depending on where they got in, may have only recently gotten anywhere near back to even.
There may be hope yet. There are a number of reasons for saying this, chief among them being the fact that four Venator insiders purchased a combined 95,800 shares on the open market at prices ranging from 6.81 to 8.25 per share during February and March. Treasurer John Cannon plunked down nearly $300,000 for 38,000 shares. Interestingly, it was only last July that Cannon sold 25,257 shares for just under $270,000. Needless to say, that Cannon recently invested more than he took out less than one year ago is a striking development.
Among the remaining buyers, CFO Bruce Hartman and director Purdy Crawford picked up 35,000 shares and 20,000 shares, respectively. A new filer, VP Robert McHugh, accounted for the balance. What is perhaps most encouraging about the activity is that the insiders began buying at less than 7 and continued to purchase shares even as the stock rose above 8. Apparently these insiders were not waiting for the stock to pull back -- and it hasn't.
Of course, for a company best known for its name changes, reorganizations, cutbacks and charges, Venator's future is far from certain. The stock is certainly not for the sentimental or the faint of heart. In addition to Woolworth's, Venator has already cut loose its
shoe stores. On the block are San Francisco
, Foot Locker outlets,
and many of its
For investors concerned that only so much money can be made by cutting costs, Venator just announced a $21.5 million alliance with
. Under the agreement, not only will
products be available on
, but the company will also receive broad promotion on AOL's
, the No. 1 ranked cyberspace sports destination. This could really come in handy should young shoppers' tastes drift back toward athletic footwear, especially now that some of the excess supply has dried up.
According to Venator, excluding the myriad one-time items, the company would have posted fourth-quarter earnings of 12 cents, a penny below the
mean estimate of 13 cents. Then again, with all the finagling, predicting Venator's earnings is a fool's task. The real issue is whether the company has at last positioned itself to improve going forward. Management has publicly expressed its confidence. The recent insider buys seem to second the motion. Now, if only Wall Street gets on board, maybe Venator can shake the last vestige of its five-and-dime past -- its share price.
In addition to an array of comments (some profane, some otherwise), I've received a number of emails from readers asking specific questions on insider-related issues. Until now, we've been answering them as best we can on a one-off basis. Call me dense, but it wasn't until I received a number of letters asking specifically for a Q&A Forum that it occurred to me just how good an idea this was.
Oddly (perhaps out of a desire to ask only one question at a time), those who have written requesting a Q&A forum have invariably failed to ask a question. So, in response to those and to anybody else with the same idea: By all means
send in your questions. There is no guarantee that we will get to them all, but we'll do our best to address the best and brightest in coming columns.
Bob Gabele has been tracking and analyzing insider trading since 1978, most recently for First Call/Thomson Financial. This column is not meant as investment advice; it is instead meant to provide insight into the methods of insider trading. At time of publication, Gabele held no position in any of the companies discussed in this column, although holdings can change at any time. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks. Gabele appreciates your feedback at