U.S. Trade Deficit Remains Problem - TheStreet

U.S. Trade Deficit Remains Problem

The U.S. trade deficit increased in April, continuing to reflect the impact of China's unfair currency policy.
Publish date:

The Commerce Department reported Thursday that the April deficit on international trade in goods and services increased to $40.3 billion from $40.0 billion in March.

The trade deficit, along with the credit and housing bubbles, was a principal cause of the Great Recession. Now, a rising trade deficit and continued weakness among regional banks, which are still burdened by bad loans, threatens to stifle the emerging recovery and keep unemployment near 10% through 2011.

At 3.3% of GDP, the trade deficit subtracts more from the demand for U.S.-made goods and services than President Obama's stimulus package adds to demand. Moreover, Obama's stimulus is temporary, whereas the trade deficit is permanent and growing again.

Subsidized manufactures from China and petroleum account for nearly the entire deficit, and both will rise as consumer spending and oil prices increase through 2010

Money spent on Chinese coffee makers and Middle East oil cannot be spent on U.S.-made goods and services, unless offset by exports.

When imports substantially exceed exports, Americans must consume much more than the incomes they earn producing goods and services, or the demand for what they make is inadequate to clear the shelves, inventories pile up, layoffs result and the economy goes into recession.

To keep Chinese products artificially inexpensive on U.S. store shelves and discourage U.S. exports to China, Beijing undervalues the yuan by 40%.

The Chinese government accomplishes this by printing yuan and selling them for dollars to augment the private supply of yuan and private demand for dollars. In 2009, those purchases were about $450 billion, or 10% of China's GDP and about 35% percent of its exports of goods and services.

In 2010, the trade deficit with China is reducing U.S. GDP by more than $400 billion, or nearly 3%. Unemployment would be falling rapidly and the U.S. economy recovering more rapidly but for the trade deficit with China and Beijing's currency policies.

Longer term, China's currency policies reduce U.S. growth by one percentage point a year. The U.S. economy would likely be $1 trillion larger today but for the trade deficits with China over the last 10 years.

China has indicated it will not revalue its currency at this time. Some analysts expect only a gradual revaluation if any change in policy occurs -- perhaps a few percentage points a year. Such a move would have little consequence for the U.S. trade deficit, unemployment and growth.

China views its exchange rate policy as a tool of domestic development strategy, but its policy has broad, aggressive and negative international consequences -- it is choking growth and imposing high unemployment on the United States and other western countries.

Diplomacy has failed, and President Obama should impose a tax on dollar yuan conversions in an amount equal to the amount of China currency market intervention divided by its exports -- currently that would be about 30%. For imports, at least, that would offset China's subsidies that harm U.S. businesses and workers.

After diplomacy has failed for both Presidents Bush and Obama, failure to act amounts to no more than appeasement and wholesale neglect of President Obama's obligations to advocate a level playing field for U.S. workers.

Professor Peter Morici, of the Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland, is a recognized expert on economic policy and international economics. Prior to joining the university, he served as director of the Office of Economics at the U.S. International Trade Commission. He is the author of 18 books and monographs and has published widely in leading public policy and business journals, including the Harvard Business Review and Foreign Policy. Morici has lectured and offered executive programs at more than 100 institutions, including Columbia University, the Harvard Business School and Oxford University. His views are frequently featured on CNN, CBS, BBC, FOX, ABC, CNBC, NPR, NPB and national broadcast networks around the world.