For a second-straight day, major proxies fought a mainly uphill battle, trying to recoup lost ground. In contrast to
Wednesday, however, the comeback trail proved too steep on Thursday.
Dow Jones Industrial Average
closed down 1.3% to 8623.28 and not far from its intraday low of 8608.75. Similarly, the
shed 1.2% to 906.55 after trading as low as 905.90 while the
lost 1.4% to 1410.80 vs. its nadir of 1411.10.
Some fundamental events spurred the decline, but some positive developments were overlooked, which is a marked change from recent trends.
Issues weighing on shares included lackluster comparable-store retail sales for November, which pushed the S&P Retail Index down 1.9%; cautious comments from
, which lost 17%; and heightened prospects for a bankruptcy filing by
, which tumbled 68% after the Air Transportation Stabilization Board rejected its application for a $1.8 billion federal loan guarantee.
Amid concern about the fallout of a UAL bankruptcy on the aerospace industry, shares of
were big drags on major averages.
Additionally, there were worries about
midquarter update after the close, Friday's employment report, as well as the approaching deadline for Iraqi compliance. (Intel, which slid 4% during regular-hours trading, raised guidance for fourth-quarter sales shortly after the close.)
However, the declines also came amid some positive news developments, including a larger-than-expected, 50-basis-point rate cut from the European Central Bank, another drop in weekly jobless claims, an upbeat forecast from
, which rose 0.7%, and raised guidance by
Advanced Micro Devices
A few weeks ago, such a combination of news would have sent shares skyward, particularly those of the chip and related groups. AMD rallied 5.1%, but the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Semiconductor Index shed 1.1%, further evidence that the worm has turned to the negative on Wall Street, at least for the time being.
Technically speaking, the S&P's breach of support at around 910 bodes poorly and would seem to indicate a test of even more critical support at 900 is imminent, perhaps early Friday, depending on the tone of the November employment report.
About the only factor working in the bulls' favor these days is that volume has not accelerated during the market's five-session setback. Indeed, there has not been one day with volume meaningfully above average since Nov. 21, confirmed John Bollinger, founder of BollingerBands.com. Volume was modest again Thursday, although inclement weather on the East Coast certainly dampened activity. About 1.25 billion shares traded on the
, the lowest total since Nov. 11, and just under 1.5 billion shares in Nasdaq activity.
The lack of big volume "is a good indication that there is still a great deal of underlying bullishness, and that there is abundant cash waiting to come in on any sign of a pullback," observed
contributor Richard Arms. "The Arms Index numbers have been quite high on down days, thereby eliminating the overbought condition of a week ago; this seems to be setting the stage for another rallying phase to get going very soon."
On Thursday, the one-day Arms Index rose 6.4% to 1.76; readings above 1.50 are generally considered signs of rising bearishness. The Arms Index measures the ratio of advancing stocks vs. declining by the ratio of up volume vs. down. The index rises and falls depending on whether volume is heavier in advancing stocks or declining issues and is used as a measure of sentiment -- which is often a contrarian indicator.
On the other hand, the absence of heavy volume accompanying the selloff is "normal and typical" at this point, according to Steven Hochberg, chief market analyst at Elliot Wave International in Atlanta. "I think
volume will start to pick up as we stair-step lower and hit the acceleration point of the decline."
Like many skeptics, Hochberg believes the intraday highs registered Monday -- of 9043 for the Dow, 954 for the S&P and 1521 for the Comp -- will prove to be the post-Oct. 9 rally's highpoint, and levels the indices will struggle to regain for the near-to-intermediate term.
The Dow's intraday high of around 9043 represented both a 38.2% Fibonacci retracement from the all-time high in January 2000 and an approximate 50% retracement of the decline between its high on March 19, 2002, and its October low, he observed.
Additionally, the S&P 500 revisited the "underside of its large head and shoulders pattern" at its peak on Monday. "You had three resistance levels converging, suggesting it was pretty strong" resistance, Hochberg said.
Some short-term cycles suggest the current decline will persist into mid-December, possibly into the week of Christmas, before the traditional year-end rally emerges, he forecast. That rally might take major averages back toward Monday's intraday highs, but it's unlikely they break through, he continued, suggesting "the first quarter of 2003 is shaping up to be a big down quarter."
Then again, Hochberg is a hard-core bear, arguing "there is no way the October lows was the end of the bear market" from the perspective of Elliot Wave theory, sentiment and valuation. "That's three strikes against the bull."
Caught in the Middle
For the record, I agree with Hochberg that it's highly unlikely a "new bull market" that will last for years began on Oct. 9.
However, my theory is that the eight-week rally has mainly generated disbelief/skepticism in the investing class, rather than wild optimism (the
numbers notwithstanding) and believe the
scenario is for the rally to continue, near term. As I've
written previously, my belief is the market will maintain an upward bias through year-end and into early 2003, the potential for short-term pullbacks notwithstanding.
I'm still so inclined and feel compelled to point this out because several readers apparently misinterpreted an earlier story with the term
"Rally-Killer" in the headline as a sign of wild negativity on my part. (If you want to use me as a contrarian indicator, go for it, just make sure you know where I'm coming from first.)
That said, now five days of pullback is apt to generate a more negative tone in my column, which is mainly intended to reflect what is happening and what market participants are saying, rather than what I think will or should happen.
Aaron L. Task writes daily for TheStreet.com. In keeping with TSC's editorial policy, he doesn't own or short individual stocks, although he owns stock in TheStreet.com. He also doesn't invest in hedge funds or other private investment partnerships. He invites you to send your feedback to
Aaron L. Task. JRaess: Aaron L. Task writes daily for TheStreet.com. In keeping with TSC's editorial policy, he doesn't own or short individual stocks, although he owns stock in TheStreet.com. He also doesn't invest in hedge funds or other private investment partnerships. He invites you to send your feedback to
Aaron L. Task.