Skip to main content

NEW YORK (Reuters Blogs) -- This was not a good weekend for Russian billionaires. First, Boris Berezovsky was found dead at his English country estate. Now, all the uninsured depositors (read: Russian plutocrats) at Cyprus' two largest banks are going to be hit much, much harder than they feared they might be when the Cyprus crisis first erupted last week.

Back then -- a long, long week ago -- Cypriot President Nicos Anastasiades stood firm: There was no way he would allow uninsured depositors to lose more than 10% of their money. What a difference a week makes: Now, if your uninsured deposits are at the

Bank of Cyprus

, you're probably going to lose about 40% And if they're at


, you're going to lose





between the Cypriot government and the troika of the EU, IMF, and ECB is a bold and brutal geopolitical power-play. There might be language in the official


about how "The Eurogroup looks forward to an agreement between Cyprus and the Russian Federation on a financial contribution," but given the billions of euros that Russians are being forced to contribute unwillingly, the chances that they'll happily throw a bit more money into the pot have to be tiny.

In the Europe vs. Russia

poker game

, the Europeans have played the most aggressive move they can, essentially forcing Russian depositors to contribute maximally to the bailout against their will. If this is how the game ends, it's an unambiguous loss for Russia, and a win for the EU. For one thing, there won't be any capital controls: that's a

a good thing

. (Some deposits at Bank of Cyprus will be frozen, which is a kind of capital control, but there aren't


-style barriers on the general movement of euros in and out of the country.) On top of that, public markets have been left unruffled: there's been no panic on Europe's


, partly because the biggest hit has been taken by private Russian citizens.

Much more importantly, the two main vectors of contagion -- hitting insured deposits, and exiting the euro -- have been avoided. And most elegantly of all, from the troika's point of view, the whole thing has been constructed under existing bank-resolution authorities, which means that no vote needs to be put to the Cypriot parliament, and therefore no amount of Russian pressure can veto the deal in Nicosia.

Of course, the game does not end here. It's unlikely that

Russia will appear

bearing a better deal at some point in the next 24 hours, but the hit to Cyprus' GDP is going to be so enormous that staying in the euro over the long term, absent another round or two of massive debt relief, is going to be extremely difficult. The deal as constructed is, in


wonderful phrase, "Iceland without the fish": Cyprus, as Iceland did before it, is letting its banks fail, since they're too big for the government to bail out. But Iceland has other industries besides banking -- and, more importantly, has a floating currency as well, which by weakening can make those industries more competitive.

In order to truly become Iceland, then, Cyprus is going to need to devalue and default. If it doesn't, then it will live unhappily under the yoke of Europe-imposed austerity until such a time as the parliament revolts, the austerity measures are revoked, and the island drops out of the euro, and probably out of the EU as well. Cyprus' economy is going to suffer greatly over the next few years, and its citizens are going to blame Europe for their woes; it's entirely possible that they will


leave the euro, if the alternative is negative economic growth as far as the eye can see, along with a massively overvalued currency. If and when those rumblings start appearing, expect the Russians to start being extremely nice to the Cypriots all over again.

Meanwhile, the resolution of Laiki is going to give the world a very real example of what happens when a too-big-to-fail bank is allowed to fail. Laiki is small by global standards, but very large by comparison with Cyprus' GDP. If Cyprus can survive Laiki's collapse, then maybe -- just maybe -- the world could cope with the "resolution" of a big bank like


. But that's a very big "if." More likely, the costs to Cyprus of allowing Laiki to fail will be enormous, both politically and economically. And 800,000 Cypriots will for years to come be paying the price of what

Mohamed El-Erian

elegantly calls "bailout fatigue."

-- Written by Felix Salmon in New York. Read more of Felix's blogs at Reuters.