NEW YORK (
) -- Why isn't anyone getting mad about the lunacy of the oil market? Why isn't anyone asking, "What is going on here?" anymore. It must be the highflying stock market and decent earnings reports, convincing us that at least the financial end isn't nigh. Everybody must be too busy trying to make back the money they lost last year to care about the catastrophe in oil that is replaying itself.
Last year, as oil ratcheted up to $150 a barrel, I felt alone in screaming about the obvious decoupling of the fundamentals from the price, fighting the opposite viewpoints of the likes of heavyweights such as then-Secretary of the Treasury Hank Paulson and Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman.
This year, every oil analyst who comes on
now seems to sound like me: "A liquidity trade," they crow. "A play on the weak dollar," they advise. These are euphemisms for a market with no tethers to supply and demand fundamentals, and it's arguably
than it was last year, as we have the added fuel of rapidly expanding ETFs in energy to add kerosene to this already raging liquidity fire. But now that we're all "on the same page" on what's causing this, I am astounded by the blithe spirit of all of these analysts. I wonder where the outrage is. Where is the concern?
People continue to forget that commodities
If the stock market runs ahead of itself and decouples from its fundamentals, as most experts believe it probably has now, no one needs to get outraged about it. If stock prices have now gotten ahead of reasonable forecasts for earnings and growth, everyone still understands the game: You make your bets and take your chances.
But oil decoupling hurts everyone.
It hurts American consumers and reduces purchasing power. It sends more than $200 billion a year overseas into sovereign wealth funds of Middle Eastern countries that don't like us very much.
For American business, it's even worse: Fully 25% of the companies represented by the
New York Stock Exchange
are energy-dependent. Nothing can have a bigger and more direct impact on the productivity and potential for our economy more directly than the price of the crude barrel.
And now, there's one recent trend to assure prices go even further up, making these ridiculous prices look cheap: Domestic refineries are being forced to shut down.
has closed a big refinery in New Jersey, and
has shut one of its largest in Aruba.
Refining Stocks: Oil Trade
They've done this to combat puny margins caused by rising liquidity and investment-driven crude prices. And I think more shutdowns are on their way.
They've got no choice, the refiners. They're fighting back the only way they can. But these shutdowns will cause a synthetic shortage of refined products -- the stuff people actually
. It's already beginning. The Department of Energy reports from last week showed a 5 million-barrel drawdown in gasoline. I'm expecting this week to be much the same, showing an outsized draw of refined products. And you can't stop and restart refineries like you can a kid on a skateboard.
By the spring, we're looking at a full-fledged shortage at the pumps. Now
a fundamental you can bank on to send the prices of refined products and crude higher -- much higher. Put a little shortfall of gasoline into this mix of low-dollar, ETF-crazed crude trading and can $120 oil be far away again?
And it will happen while demand is at 14-year lows, while we are still a long way from a full recovery from the worst recession since the 1930s.
I have to ask again: Where's the concern? Maybe when oil unnecessarily goes over $100 again or touches $150, we'll see some. But I don't see it yet. Maybe we've all become inured by triple-digit prices. But we're staring into a fresh disaster on oil that could single-handedly derail whatever recovery we're expecting.
We're catastrophe-driven, I guess, and when the catastrophe looks to be averted, everyone forgets.
Last year, I screamed to make a point about the lunacy of oil pricing. This year, in a way that has astounded me, the disaster is repeating itself in perhaps even worse form. This year, it seems, that's what I'll have to be screaming about.
Written by Daniel Dicker in New York
At the time of publication, Dicker was long Valero.
Dan Dicker has been a floor trader at the New York Mercantile Exchange with more than 20 years' experience. He is a licensed commodities trade adviser. Dan's recognized energy market expertise includes active trading in crude oil, natural gas, unleaded gasoline and heating oil futures contracts; fundamental analysis including supply and demand statistics (DOE, EIA), CFTC trade reportage, volume and open interest; technical analysis including trend analysis, stochastics, Bollinger Bands, Elliot Wave theory, bar and tick charting and Japanese candlesticks; and trading expertise in outright, intermarket and intramarket spreads and cracks.
Dan also designed and supervised the introduction of the new Nymex PJM electricity futures contract, launched in April 2003, which cleared more than 600,000 contracts last year alone. Its launch has been the basis of Nymex's resurgence in the clearing of power market contracts over the last three years.
Dan Dicker has appeared as an energy analyst since 2002 with all the major financial news networks. He has lent his expertise in hundreds of live radio and television broadcasts as an analyst of the oil markets on CNBC, Bloomberg US and UK and CNNfn. Dan is the author of many energy articles published in Nymex and other trade journals.
Dan obtained a bachelor of arts degree from the State University of New York at Stony Brook in 1982.