NEW YORK (TheStreet) --It's an accepted fact in the market that venture-capital firms, angel investors and private-equity firms are the participants that clean up during an IPO. Or do they? Usually when a company goes public, these are the parties that look as if they've made a bundle. The headlines shout how much a small investment has paid off. It makes the average investor feel as if he didn't get the same opportunity for the big payday.



(FB) - Get Report

went public, some of the

hype generated

was due to the parade of early investors that made millions on their relatively small investments. This made small investors figure it was a deal they wanted to get in on. If the smart money liked it, it must be good; if they made millions, so will I.

Facebook for Dummies: Wait for $25>>

The facts, however, contradict the myth. It turns out that venture-cap returns haven't significantly outperformed the market since the late 1990s, according to a study by the Kaufman Foundation. Since 1997, less cash has been returned to investors than has been invested. Only four of 30 venture-cap funds with over $400 million in committed capital delivered better returns than a publicly traded small-cap common stock index.

Kaufman analyzed 100 different funds and found that a majority of the funds -- 62 out of 100 -- failed to exceed returns that investors could have gotten in the public market after fees and carry costs were paid. Fees are a sticky subject. Typically VCs earn 2% per year for a management fee for the first five years of a fund. On top of that, they also take 20% of the profits of each deal when it is sold; this is commonly known as the 2 and 20.

Most people believe that VCs are paid by performance. However, two different studies determined that they earn one-half to two-thirds of their revenue from the management fees -- essentially making them very handsomely paid asset managers. If the VCs are so good at making sweet

deals like Facebook,

then why, a smart investor might ask, are they so dependent on these fixed fees?

Of course, most people are more than willing to pay for performance if their investment can beat the market. Kaufman's data looked at the years between 1989 and 2010 and found that only 25 of 96 funds beat the market by 3%. So maybe the grass isn't greener on the other side, unless you are in with the popular crowd. It seems the great returns are concentrated in a small number of select firms. Cambridge Associates noted there are about 50 "top-performing" VC funds. So if you are hoping to beat the public odds with a venture-cap manager, then only go with the top tier names.

A quick look at the top 10 overall funds as ranked by


bore this out. Most of the names in the top 10 were also early Facebook investors delivering great performance for their clients. No. 1 ranked Andreessen Horowitz's Marc Andreessen owns millions of shares of Facebook and Andreessen is on the board. He also owns shares of


and will collect a payday there when that acquisition is complete. Accel is listed as No. 3. Accel invested $12.7 million in Facebook in 2005 and it is now worth as much as $6 billion. Only No. 2 Sequoia missed out on the Facebook financing largely because an old dispute with Facebook's founding President Sean Parker.

Ultimately, if you don't have a quarter of a million or more to get into the private-equity side of the business, and especially in this top tier group, then you're stuck in the public market. But that might not be so bad.

You won't be paying huge fees; your money won't be tied up for years; you can choose nternet funds that have excellent returns like

ProFunds Internet UltraSector

(INPIX) - Get Report

with a trailing return of 30% for three years or

Jacob Internet

(JAMFX) - Get Report

with a return of 19% for the same period.

Don't be miffed that you missed out on making millions on the Facebook deal because you aren't in a marquee venture-cap fund. You can just as easily rival their performance in a regular mutual fund with a minimal fee.

All venture-cap funds do not make their clients millions. Consider this myth busted.

--Written by Debra Borchardt in New York.

>To contact the writer of this article, click here:

Debra Borchardt


>To follow the writer on Twitter, go to


>To submit a news tip, send an email to:


Disclosure: TheStreet's editorial policy prohibits staff editors, reporters and analysts from holding positions in any individual stocks.