) -- Since the beginning of the "Great Credit Crunch" at the end of 2007 there have been 442 bank failures: the

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

closed 25 banks in 2008, then 140 in 2009, then an annual peak of 157 in 2010.

Bank failures tapered off to 92 in 2011, and so far in 2012 the pace of failures has slowed to just 28 year to date. My standing prediction has been that 500 to 800 banks face failure before the banking crisis is over.

What's important to investors is to avoid the publicly traded community banks that have the risk-characteristics of those that have been closed due to failure.

Since the end of 2007 the number of FDIC-insured financial institutions declined by 1,227, or 14.4% to 7,307 from 8,534. Most of this decline comes from mergers, some of which are assisted by the FDIC, others on the desire by sellers to avoid failure. The remaining closed banks are FDIC-forced failures.

Exposures to Construction and Development and Commercial Real Estate lending have been declining in recent quarters, but there are still 1,904 institutions overexposed to C&D or CRE loans. This represents 26.1% of all FDIC-insured financial institutions. There are 1,144 publicly traded community and regional banks and 489 or 42.7% of those have overexposures to C&D and / or CRE loans. The publicly traded overexposed banks are the ones investors should know about.

At ValuEngine we publish a List of Problem Banks by name, whereas the FDIC does not publish its List of Problem Banks. To subscribe, go to

and click on the Newsletters tab. This report is called, "ValuEngine FDIC Evaluation Report".

Another sign of stress in the banking system is the status of banks' real estate loan pipelines. Pipeline is the percentage of real estate loans outstanding vs. loan commitments, where a healthy bank pipeline is around 60% funded. A pipeline that's 100% funded indicates that all loan commitments have been fully funded, and the bank is not getting the monthly payments they expect in terms of interest and principal payments.

There are 736 institutions that have their real estate loan commitments fully funded, which makes it extremely difficult for these institutions to extend new real estate loans. I believe that if a bank has a pipeline that's 80% or more funded, they are reluctant to extend additional real estate loans. This is the status for 2905 community banks or 39.8% of all FDIC-insured financial institutions.

Table of data provided by the FDIC

The table above shows the thirteen largest banks by total assets that are overexposed to CRE loans according to data from the FDIC. These thirteen are not likely to fail, as many others on the ValuEngine Lists have significantly higher risk exposures.

ValuEngine has a Buy rating on

East West Bancorp

(EWBC) - Get Report


Signature Bank

TheStreet Recommends

(SBNY) - Get Report


International Bancshares

(IBOC) - Get Report


Umpqua Holdings

(UMPQ) - Get Report

; IBOC is the only bank in the table that is overexposed the C&D loans, but its risk ratio is only 101.7% of risk-based capital.

Central Bancompany


is not covered by ValuEngine and the stock is extremely inactive in terms of trading volume.

All other banks in the above table have Hold ratings according to ValuEngine.

The only two banks in the above table with Pipeline risk above 80% are


(SNV) - Get Report

and EWBC.

To measure the technical strength for community banks I track the weekly chart for the

America's Community Bankers Index

(ABAQ). This index is a composite of over 400 community banks with an aggregate $125 billion market cap.

The weekly chart for ABAQ is negative with declining momentum (12x3x3 weekly slow stochastic) reading and a weekly close below the five-week modified moving average at 158.98. ABAQ is still up 4.8% year to date, but its down 9.1% from its March 19th high at 170.54. My quarterly value level is 142.79 with my annual risky level at 166.87.

Chart Courtesy of Thomson / Reuters

This article is commentary by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.

At the time of publication, the author had no positions in any of the stocks mentioned.