Around midday today the rumor began to spread on the Street that most of the brutal selling on
this morning was past, and that after U.S. District Judge
Thomas Penfield Jackson's
release of his Conclusions of Law this afternoon at 5 p.m. EDT, we'll see buyers coming in in afterhours trading to re-establish Microsoft positions at the lower prices delivered by today's massacre.
I wouldn't be surprised. If you take the long-term view on Microsoft -- whole or split -- you've gotta think this one is going back up, and up a lot. With assets like
, plus an unparalleled marketing machine, Microsoft is still a giant, if a humbled one, today. And no matter how much the munchkins (think Lilliputians) try to tie the giant down (think Gulliver), he will still roar.
If perhaps, shortly, in a much higher-pitched voice.
The print press was full of interviews with Microsoft bosses this morning -- to a man (and they are all men) saying they think this afternoon will mark the high-water point of the government's case, and that from here on out, in the hands of the appeals process, Microsoft is finally going to gain some traction.
Choose one or more:
(a) Can you say "whistling past the graveyard?"
(b)Nicely orchestrated PR
(c) It's about time.
There's something to be said for the Microsoft managers' arguments. After Jackson lays into Microsoft this afternoon, things almost
to get better. The question is, how low the low? From how far down must that rebuilding begin?
If the "sell-on-the-news, buy-on-the-judge's-decision" analysis is right, this could be a great moment to get into Microsoft. But only for those with an excess of testosterone.
Me, I think we'll see more slippage when we see just how rough Jackson's Conclusions of Law are on Microsoft.
Then, after we've digested that, and maybe after we've seen what the newly emboldened
decides to ask Jackson for in terms of remedies, the price will start back up.
So in a broad sense, the Microsoft claim that things have hit bottom, or will later today, makes some sense. But the risk of betting that today's close is the bottom is considerable.
published an extended essay, in book form,
The Road Ahead. Co-conceived with Microsoft's guru-in-residence Nathan Myhrvold (and actually written by Seattle's Peter Rinearson), the book was a watery manifesto on the future role of computers -- and implicitly, of Microsoft -- in our society.
With bold and courageous stands -- the best example being a chapter, "Education: The Best Investment" -- the book drew as many giggles as it did plaudits, though in fact it did lay out a plausible digital future. (Minus, pretty much, the Web, which received only back-of-the-hand notice. Which says a lot...)
Anyway, what I think we're going to see now is a real-time, ongoing update of a new kind of
The Road Ahead
essay by Microsoft managers and spinners, a continuing, day-by-day, week-by-week, maybe year-by-year effort to shape our perception of a company chastened but unbowed by legal difficulties, at once the victim of that process and also its emerging master.
I've been saying for some time that Microsoft is clearly en route to becoming a Web-based services company, not a shrink-wrapped software producer. It may very well become the world's largest renter of software under the ASP, or Application Service Provider, model; it will be huge in providing the integration services that are the real-profit opportunities underneath the ASP model of software delivery; and I think it will become a major provider of other sophisticated services delivered over the Web.
If widespread use of Web apps means we are headed for a
operating-system-free world, then Microsoft will fold its Windows tent as slowly as any other business would stretch out earnings from a cash cow.
Microsoft is firmly set on this path internally, but it also knows
it needs the revenue from current shrink-wrap products to bridge the uncertain, years-long interval to that Brave New World
The company's real interest now, therefore, is in fighting an effective delaying action on this antitrust action, limiting the damage to its revenues from shrink-wrap and original equipment manufacturers while it rebuilds itself on the Web-services model. Its interest is not, of course, allowing itself to become hobbled in that new world -- potentially a far richer market, with an even more powerful position -- by settlements or verdicts laid down today and based, as this whole antitrust action has been, on yesterday.
Keep that in mind as you watch Microsoft's maneuverings this week, this month, this year.
They know they can't return to what they were --
and they don't want to
. They need to run two parallel companies now, one very much invisible, as they move forward. It will be a tricky dance, and for those executing it in Redmond and Washington, a potentially schizy one.
For investors, buying into that "new Microsoft" could be hugely profitable. But
that buy will be hell.
Jim Seymour is president of Seymour Group, an information-strategies consulting firm working with corporate clients in the U.S., Europe and Asia, and a longtime columnist for PC Magazine. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks. At time of publication, neither Seymour nor Seymour Group held positions in any securities mentioned in this column, although holdings can change at any time. Seymour does not write about companies that are current or recent consulting clients of Seymour Group. While Seymour cannot provide investment advice or recommendations, he invites your feedback at
email@example.com. TheStreet.com has a revenue sharing relationship with Amazon.com under which it receives a portion of the revenue from Amazon purchases by customers directed there from TheStreet.com.