McKinsey: Corporate Executives Increasingly Wary of Global and Local Economy


Sentiment is down for the 3rd straight quarter in McKinsey survey of businesses. Trump's trade policies at heart of it.

According to the McKinsey Economic Conditions Snapshot, September 2018, business sentiment is down for the third quarter. The global outlook is worsening at a faster pace than local conditions.

As they regard economic conditions at home and in the world economy, executives are warier than they have been all year. For the third quarter in a row, respondents to McKinsey’s newest survey of executive sentiment share less positive assessments of the economy’s current state, and their outlook for the months ahead is also cautious.

Expectations for trade activity are declining, trade-related risks are still perceived as top threats to growth, and for the first time this year, less than half expect the rate of economic growth, both at home and globally, will increase over the next six months.

The view from emerging economies is particularly downbeat. These respondents offer a more negative overall assessment of the global economy, economic conditions in their own countries, and their companies’ prospects. In a few cases, they are also more likely to cite the United States as the country with the best opportunities for their businesses, rather than their home countries or nearby economies.

Home Economies

Image placeholder title

The share of respondents saying conditions in their home economies are worse now than six months ago is nearly equal to the share saying conditions are better. Globally, things are worse.

In their assessment of the global economy, 38 percent of all respondents say conditions have worsened in the past six months, up from 26 percent in June. At 31 percent, the share reporting improvements is even smaller; it’s the first time since December 2016 that a larger share of respondents say global economic conditions have worsened than have improved.


Image placeholder title

36 percent of respondents say that in the past year, the level of trade between their home countries and the rest of the world has decreased, up from 22 percent who said so in June. In a few regions (North America, most notably), respondents have reported sizable declines in their countries’ trade levels in the past two surveys.

By contrast, those in India and in Latin America are the most likely to report an increase in trade levels, and they are the only two groups less likely to report declines in this survey than they were one year ago.

​Waning optimism

Looking ahead, respondents also report a progressively less positive outlook on the economy. Compared with the past two surveys, smaller shares predict that the global economy and their home economies will be better in six months than they are now.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

Comments (4)
No. 1-4

Robert P. Murphy is an Austrian Economist, Senior Fellow at the Mises Institute. Excellent but long video:


Day traders may be influenced by these kinds of studies of sentiment -- investors, not so much. Although McKinsey may send their survey forms to guys with big titles, we all know that those guys pass the survey down to some flunkie to fill in -- if they respond at all.

In the meantime, the dishonestly named North American FREE Trade Agreement has been sent to the trashcan of history, and Canada has signed on to the fairer US-Mexico replacement deal. That is one small step to fighting back against the long-running trade war against the US which previous US Administrations for decades have pretended did not exist -- to the extreme disadvantage of US workers.


My optimism has been waning since the great recession. So much debt has been piled on the last 10 years it is only a matter of time before it blows sky high. There are about 400T of global debt and liabilities for the next 20 years ( being nice). We have corporations that are larger than most governments. By 2025 I think we will be a global war that is triggered by economic and geopolitical events. Maybe by 2030 we will get a reset and things will be calm again . Catharsis is necessary but my guess is the environmental forces of the planet which dont care about economics or money will revolt. By 2100 we will need a new planet to live on.


Before any significance can be made of the 4 point "trend", it would be utmost responsible to show a 40 year chart of data. Only then can we compare forward looking statements to what actually happened in the economy and financial markets.

Global Economics