Force Manure: Tesla Way Short of M3 Goals, Silicon Carbide Shortage Explanation


Twitter writer skabooshka, @skabooshka claims Tesla production is falling way short of goals due to supply shortages.

Manure or Majeure? I propose manure by Musk, with @skabooshka providing the critical evidence.

Let's investigate the claims starting with production numbers.

Electrek, Tesla's preferred source of car information spin says Tesla Slightly Behind Ambitious Model 3 Goal.

That's quite an amusing spin because the article shows Tesla is way behind its stated weekly goals. There is nothing "slight" about this.

Major Shortfall

Seeking Alpha writer Anton Wahlman sums things up more accurately, New Information Implies 10%-Plus Tesla Model 3 Shortfall For Q3.

  • Photos from the Tesla factory over the last couple of weeks had indicated much lower Model 3 production activity compared to July.
  • Now, Tesla's favored PR outlet Electrek has leaked out that quarter-to-date production has been only 30,000 for Model 3 and 47,000 including Model S and X.
  • Tesla's Model 3 production guidance for the quarter was for 50,000-55,000, with sales being higher given the inventory overhang from Q2.
  • Some reasonable extrapolation from Tesla's production-to-sales ratio in the past suggests that Tesla's 3Q Model 3 sales would be between 37,000 and 47,000.
  • That would mean, by the mildest of interpretation, a shortfall of at least approximately 10% for the quarter. Is this baked into the Street's 3Q expectations now?

The Math

Here are the numbers from Electrek.

"A reliable source told Electrek that Tesla produced just over 47,000 vehicles throughout the third quarter as of last week. According to the same source, Tesla produced just under 30,000 Model 3 vehicles so far during the quarter. The company hasn’t been able to go back to a production of 5,000 units in a single week."

Numbers in hand, let's return to Seeking Alpha.

"30,000 units divided by 57 days (31 in July and 26 in August) is 526 per day. Multiply by seven, and you get 3,684 per week. By any measure, that's a lot lower than the close to 5,000 Tesla has talked about - let alone a path up to 6,000 and eventually 10,000."

20%+ Miss

3,684 is well over a 10% miss. It's a shortage of 1,316 out of 5,000 (26% miss) or 2,316 out of 6,000 (39% miss).

Let's assume Tesla will hit 4,000 with a goal of 5,000. That's a 20% miss.

Slight? No wonder Tesla likes Electrek analysis.

Force Majeure

Numbers in hand, let's investigate Tesla's last conference call on August 1. These snips are from a Motley Fool provided Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript, emphasis mine.

  1. We continued to achieve 5,000 Model 3s per week, or 7,000 combined S, X, and 3, multiple weeks in July, showing that, so we're able to do this on a sustained basis. And we expect to, in the absence of aforce majeureor some very unexpected event, be able to achieve an average of 5,000 Model 3s or above for Q3 and 2,000 Model S, Xs or above per week for Q3 as well. So essentially, 7,000 cars a week-plus on average for Q3.
  2. And from an operating-plant standpoint, from Q3 onwards, I really want to emphasize our goal is to be profitable and cash-flow positive for every quarter, going forward. Now obviously, if there's a big recession or there's asevere force majeure eventthat interrupts the supply chain, that's not always possible but we're confident that in, provided the economy is roughly where it is today or reasonably good and there's not a big force majeure event that I feel comfortable achieving a GAAP income positive and cash-flow positive quarter every quarter from here on out. There may be occasional quarters, where we pay back a big loan or something, where there may be just because we paid back a big loan but absent that, it would be cash-flow positive.
  3. Is there anything we know at the end of July, it's one month in, we're highly confident of being cash flow positive and GAAP profitable in Q3 and Q4. Now therecould be force majeure like an earthquake*, touch wood but something like that or massive recession all of a sudden but in the absence of that, of really unusual.*..

Those comments had analysts scratching their heads as did the following report from Business Insider.

Shutting Down Early

On August 16, Business Insider reported Tesla employees say the main Model 3 production line has been shutting down early.

> On Wednesday, Tesla factory workers putting together the Model 3 on the GA3 line were allowed to go home early from the Fremont, California plant, leaving at 2:30 p.m. PT, instead of the usual 6 p.m., three Tesla employees told Business Insider. The employees spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of losing their jobs.

> Typically, a worker told Business Insider, a shift is only sent home early because it met its goals for a period of time or because there is a problem that is making it impossible to assemble more vehicles. For example, one of the two lines on GA3 might be sent home if there is a problem that has prevented the progression of assembling vehicles for hours. In this case, both lines were sent home, with the entire GA3 line leaving early. According to a factory worker, the reason was not that the company had hit its production goals for the day.

> In fact, the worker said the company missed internal targets. The employee said the target is to produce 300 cars per shift (there are two 12-hour shifts per day), but on Wednesday the line produced 211 vehicles during the day shift.

It's now all starting to come together.

@Skabooshka Picks Up The Story

Image placeholder title


Image placeholder title

Image placeholder title


Image placeholder title

Force Manure or Force Majeure?

  • Force Majeure Definition (Investopedia): Force majeure refers to a clause that is included in contracts to remove liability for natural and unavoidable catastrophes that interrupt the expected course of events and restrict participants from fulfilling obligations.
  • Manure Definition (Merriam-Webster): Refuse of stables and barnyards consisting of livestock excreta with or without litter.

Alternate Possibilities

  • Business Insider, Electrek, and Skabooshka have no idea what they are talking about, no matter how well the combined story ties together.
  • Musk has secured supplied and the alleged shortages apply to new orders and other customers.
  • Musk is sending workers home out of sudden concern for employees' mental health.

Suggestion: If it looks like BS, smells like BS, and comes straight from the mouth of a proven BSer, then it's highly likely to be more smelly BS.

And if it is more smelly BS, the SEC ought to take notice.

Disclosure: I am short Tesla via PUTs staggered from September through December.

Related Article: Tesla's U-Turn, Poor Paint, Cancellation Numbers Questioned

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

Comments (12)
No. 1-8

You gotta hand it to the guy -- he's hanging on for grim death. Virtually begging for a recession or a massive earthquake (The Big One) to get him off the hook.Lol


Would like to buy this car? You don't have to worry about the left back wheel, that's for sure. The engine is none the worse for wear. Left back bearing is as good as new. No rust showing anywhere after 10 years. Always took it to the dealer promptly on the maintenance schedule. They always found the wheel bearings to be A-OK, especially the left back one! [What are you starting to think ... ??]


Not just Tesla,Ford,Chrsler ,GM all facing soaring inflation,even the chinese parts that make up most vehicles are rising double digits,sure they can pass on alot of the inflation to suppliers /dealers let them eat most of it,but,but,but you're still lookin at 10% YOY increase in vehicle prices at least.Tesla lookin at 20% increases in costs ouch!


I am an engineer and there are world wide shortages for ceramic capacitors and DDR3/4/5 memory. In fact for most of the designs my colleagues and I are doing modules and other parts are being quoted for 12-18 week lead times. Short sighted companies have concentrated their supply chains in Asia with NO second lines in the US or Americas.


"3,684 is well over a 10% miss. It's a shortage of 1,316 out of 5,000 (26% miss) or 2,316 out of 6,000 (39% miss)."

Then one has to account for the defective cars being produced.

Denninger mentioned that the battery pack costs some $20,000. The lithium is not recyclable into new batteries and is in low concentration in the ground. Unless battery technology changes, how can enough batteries be produced for eventually all vehicles to be battery powered? Then, of coarse, the issue of producing the electricity to power all the cars.


To investigate source credibility Google "anton wahlman ubs"


Speaking of manure, why is there no citation for this article's claim that that "Musk is sending workers home" in order to imply (i.e. create FUD/manure) the line is shut down? Is this from another anonymous "reliable source"?


Force Manure, Out of context quotes designed to manipulate are nothing new. The first sentence below is cited in Mish's article which then omits the 2 following sentences :

"A reliable source told Electrek that Tesla produced just over 47,000 vehicles throughout the third quarter as of last week. Thats a new production record for the company and it put them on pace for an incredible record for the quarter. At the current rate, Tesla will end the quarter with over 70,000 vehicles produced, by far the largest EV fleet ever produced by a single manufacturer in a quarter."

Those last 2 sentences are instead substituted with another out of context quote shown in first sentence below that further omits Electrek's next summary comment:

"According to the same source, Tesla produced just under 30,000 Model 3 vehicles so far during the quarter. That means that Tesla is on pace to end up just below the lower end of its goal to produce between 50,000 to 55,000 Model 3 vehicles in the third quarter though they could easily hit it by trending just a bit up over the next month, which is highly likely."

Unbiased reporting or not? Yours to decide.

Global Economics