China Fires Back with Tariffs on LNG, Wheat, Whine: US LNG Exporters Dive


China has prepared a list of retaliations if Trump escalates the trade war with China.

Last week Trump threatened to escalate the trade war with China. Today China responded with threats of its own starting with 25% Tariffs on US LNG.

China is proposing a 25 percent tariff on imports of U.S. liquefied natural gas as retaliation for the Trump administration’s latest threat to impose levies on the Asian giant, a major blow to an emerging American business.

Billions of U.S. dollars may hang in the balance. Cheniere, Tellurian Inc. and other LNG developers have been courting utilities and state-backed companies in the Asian country to justify construction of more terminals to ship the super-chilled form of natural gas. The shares of America’s largest gas exporter, Cheniere Energy Inc., fell on the report.

China accounted for 13 percent of the exports from Cheniere’s Sabine Pass terminal in Louisiana as of mid-June, based on ship-tracking data compiled by Bloomberg. The Houston-based company dropped as much as 7.7 percent after the report, the biggest one-day percentage decline since 2016, while Tellurian slid as much as 6.7 percent.

Assuming the tariffs “go into effect, this is a pretty dramatic move by China,” David Lang, global head of LNG at law firm Baker & McKenzie LLP, said by phone. “This has a real impact on prospective deals,” and could affect the next wave of U.S. LNG export projects, he said.

Kudlow Unimpressed

Bloomberg reports Kudlow Says Trump Won't Back Off as China Expands Trade War

President Donald Trump will keep pressing China for trade concessions, a top White House economic adviser said, as the Asian nation continued the tariff escalation by announcing further retaliatory actions against U.S. goods.

“We’ve said many times: no tariffs, no tariff barriers, no subsidies. We want to see trade reforms. China is not delivering, OK?,” National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow said in a Bloomberg Television interview on Friday. “Their economy’s weak, their currency is weak, people are leaving the country. Don’t underestimate President Trump’s determination to follow through.”

China also signaled on Friday it has no intention of retreating from a trade war. The government announced it has prepared a list of $60 billion worth of U.S. goods to hit with duties should the U.S. follow through on a plan to impose duties on an additional $200 billion of Chinese goods, as early as next month. The Chinese duties ranging from 5 percent to 25 percent will be levied on 5,207 kinds of American imports, the Ministry of Finance said in a statement on its website.

Beijing’s plans for tariffs on $60 billion of U.S. goods includes an additional 5 percent in duty on about 600 kinds of U.S. products including planes and computers; another 10 percent on almost 1,000 products including wigs and textiles; an extra 20 percent on more than 1,000 items including some chemicals, cookers and paper; and an additional 25 percent on over 2,400 products such as meat, wheat, wine and LNG.

More Winning Coming Up

More winning is in the way. Trump will likely follow through on a proposed 25% tax on goods from China, and China will retaliate. This is called "winning"

It's safe to add Cheniere, Tellurian Inc. and other LNG developers to the Growing List of Companies and Organizations Complaining About Tariffs

Fight Fire With Fire

Some of my readers praise Trump for these actions on the basis he needs to "fight fire with fire". Such thoughts are complete silliness.

As I have stated dozens of times, if China is supplying the US with cheap steal, cheap solar panels, cheap whatever, we should be grateful.

Once again, this is indisputable: Standards of living rise when more goods are available at a cheaper price.

Please China, make us pay more! How stupid is that? There is not a damn thing to fight!

There are concerns about theft of IP, but nothing forces companies to do business with China if they believe the threat is real. Anyway, tariffs are not the proper way to deal with such issues.

In regards to the EU, it will take at least a decade to work out another treaty because all 27 nations will have to sign on and ratify the package. It will not happen under Trump.

Finally, and as I have also stated before, trade imbalances started when Nixon closed the gold window. It is absurd to expect tariffs will solve that problem.

Related Articles

This is not about beating up on Trump, this is about beating up on blatantly foolish ideas.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

Comments (22)
No. 1-14

Agree with you 100% Mish. Tariffs are a self inflicted wound, yet Trump wants more, more, more. The list of companies that are negatively impacted will only grow longer as this moron keeps up this stupidity.


The tariffs will eat into profitability of S&P 500 companies who manufacture in China. Trump is trying to bring back all manufacturing to America too quickly. American consumers can't pay more than earn. If companies decided to pay employees in the US a lot more it might work over time but an economic crash of historic proportions is likely coming.

Nobody For President
Nobody For President

I agree China should impose tariffs on US Whine, but we can get by without their cheap steal...


How were things doing before Trump? Trying to reverse what the establishment has done over the last 30 years is a good thing. Continuing the same trade policies will not help the USA. Besides, I don’t see it as a redeeming quality to exploit slave labor and destructive environmental policies, which we cannot get away with in the US. NAFTA did not increase the wages for Mexican’s as we were sold, and generally speaking it’s better to manufacture close where the product is consumed, except when someone can get screwed. BTW, the root problem is not the Fed or Nixon closing the gold window. The big problem is career politicians, that will sell their soul to stay in power.



China imports a lot of food, tariffs will raise the prices The People will have to pay. However, somehow I don't think the Chinese people whining about food prices will get the same attention that whiners in the US get.


Freudian slip in the headline there Mish with the word "whine". Food prices in the US should drop quite a bit when domestic wheat prices drop due to the surplus. There's always two sides to this globalist coin and the side that benefits America is a net positive. Globalists can whine all they want.


Trump wants zero tariffs, he's said so many times. Sometimes you have to play by the opponent's rules to win. Someone wrote a whole book about such tactics a couple decades ago. Come to think of it, that was Trump.


The problem is you use dollars to denominate things, but it is a person's wages v.s. the prices they pay for goods. We used to have $40/hr (w/benefits) blue collar jobs and $10 T-Shirts. Now we have $10/hr jobs and $5 T-shirts. So for the vast majority of people, T-Shirts take more of their wages for their working hours. And worse, you want them to make $0/hr and go on welfare, so they would be making -$10/hr, which you have to pay for in taxes so they can have $4 T-shirts.

I convert my work into dollars, which is merely a medium of exchange, then convert those dollars into goods and services. So the correct measure is how much work I have to do to buy the goods and services, not how much they cost in dollars.


You can't really have it both ways. Sometimes having 'cheap sh-t' from China isn't really so cheap in the long run. Sure, it suits those who have set up their businesses and lifestyles on us buying cheap sh-t from China, but industry, jobs, military security depend on a nation actually being able to source those things from within.

On the same page here, there's an article about "Free Stuff" (Medicare for all) which argues that sometimes what appears to be free, really isn't.

Tariffs and trade have to be viewed with a longer range time frame of what is really best instead of what will benefit me right now. It's a shortcoming of our N. American thinking in politics and managing businesses for this quarter's results, etc.

I, for one, am grateful that someone is taking a longer view


You premise does not ring true. If the EU can instantly raise tariffs on products as it did then it can instantly lower them as well without going to the whole block.

Ross Perot was right. NAFTA started the giant sucking sound of high paying jobs leaving the country. We get cheap products in return but it is not much of a payback.

With the lose of those higher paying jobs came the loss of of their health benefits as well. It started the death spiral of rising health insurance costs.

In addition, we tend to respect a persons labor much better than China. My daughter managed 5 Chinese factories for a clothing importer. Her boss wanted even cheaper costs. On his trip to China they showed him the cheapest factory. It was full of little children working dangerous mills. He cried as he left.

China needs to respect people and their intellectual property. Given time, they may. Given time, they may not.


Trump is trying to lower trade barriers but he doesn't realize the US cant compete on price alone. In project management you have time, cost and quality. Trump should push US manufacturers to compete on quality and not cost or time. People will pay more for higher quality.


A Chinese tariff on US Whine? Why should the Democrats have to pay for everything? Is that fair?

The US has been ill-served by its Political Class for too many years. Mish's theory about the (short term) benefit (to a subset of the population) of lower import prices depends on those in the US who inevitably lose their jobs finding new better-paying jobs, presumably in higher technology items which the Chinese cannot yet match. Yet, for example, Billy Clinton gave the Chinese access to very expensively developed US missile guidance technology -- and now the Chinese compete with the US on satellite launches.

Mish's theory on the benefits of low-priced imports is like the now-disproved environmentalists' Anthropogenic Global Warming theory -- there is a grain of truth in the over-simplified theory, but the real world is so much more complex with many additional factors the model ignores; consequently, the theory is useless.

Just to be clear -- bilateral free trade is a worthy goal, including the very important elimination of non-tariff barriers as well as zero tariffs; unilateral free trade with a mercantilist nation like China is slow economic suicide.

Global Economics