Each business day, TheStreet.com Ratings TheStreet.com Ratings compiles a list of the top five stocks in five categories -- fast-growth, all-around value, large-cap, mid-cap and small-cap -- based on data from the close of the previous trading session.
Today, large-cap stocks are in the spotlight. These are stocks of companies with market capitalizations of over $10 billion that rank near the top of all stocks rated by our proprietary quantitative model, which looks at more than 62 factors. In addition, the stocks must be followed by at least one financial analyst who posts estimates on the Institutional Brokers' Estimate System. The stocks are ordered by their potential to appreciate.
Note that no provision is made for off-balance-sheet assets such as unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments, market value of real estate or contingent liabilities that might affect book value. This could be material for some companies with large underfunded pension plans.
provides digital television entertainment in the United States and Latin America. We have buy
since May 2006 due to the company's impressive revenue growth, expanding profit margins, increased cash balance and notable return on equity.
For the first quarter of fiscal 2009, DirecTV posted revenue growth of 6.8% year over year, slightly outpacing the industry average of 3.3%. This growth does not appear to have trickled down to the company's bottom line, as EPS decreased 37.5% in the first quarter, but we feel that DirecTV is poised for EPS growth in the coming year. The company's gross profit margin is 49.80%, which we consider to be strong. Increasing return on equity in comparison to the prior year's quarter is an additional sign of strength within the company.
Management was pleased with the company's net subscriber additions in the first quarter. According to most measures we evaluated, the company has generally poor debt management, but we feel that the strengths detailed above outweigh any potential weakness at this time.
is an enterprise software company that develops, manufactures, distributes, services, and markets database, middleware, and application software worldwide. The company has been
since October 2004 because of such positive factors as its expanding profit margins, solvency, efficiency and revenue growth.
For the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the company reported that its revenue increased slightly by 1.9%. EPS remained flat, however, indicating that the revenue improvement did not trickle down to Oracle's bottom line. Although the company has reported somewhat volatile earnings recently, we feel that it is poised for EPS growth in the coming year. Oracle's gross profit margin increased since the same quarter a year ago and is currently very high at 20.2%. Its net profit margin of 24.4% is above the industry average. Net operating cash flow increased to 25.11% in the third quarter. A quick ratio of 1.8 demonstrates strong liquidity, although a debt-to-equity ratio above the industry average indicates that Oracle's management of debt levels may need to be evaluated further.
Based on its third quarter results, record operating cash flow, and free cash flow, Oracle decided to pay its first quarterly cash dividend to holders of common stock. The 5 cents per share will be paid on May 8. Although the company may harbor some minor weaknesses, we feel that they are unlikely to have a significant impact on future financial results.
owns and operates Florida Power & Light Company, supplying electric service to a population of more than eight million throughout most of the east and lower west coasts of Florida. We have
since January 2009 due to the company's impressive growth and strong fundamentals.
For the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the company reported that its revenue increased 7.9% year over year, beating the industry average of 3.1%. This appears to have led to FPL's 45.2% improvement in EPS, which is a continuation of a pattern of positive EPS growth over the past two years. We feel that this trend should continue, and the market expects an improvement from $4.07 to $4.23 this year. Net income also increased in the first quarter, rising 46.2% from $249 million to $364 million. Return on equity improved slightly when compared to the same quarter last year and can therefore be considered a modest strength for FPL Group. Although the company's stock price is down 15.86%, we do not feel that this should necessarily be interpreted as negative. The drop in price reflects, in part, the market's overall decline and is one factor that makes this stock an attractive investment at this time.
Based on its first quarter results, FPL Group raised its guidance for both fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010. The company projects adjusted earnings for full year 2009 in the range of $4.20 to $4.40 per share and in the range of $4.65 to $5.05 per share for full year 2010. Although most measures we evaluated indicated that the company has had generally poor debt management, we feel that the strengths detailed above outweigh any potential weakness at this time.
Enterprise Products Partners
is a midstream energy company that provides services to producers and consumers of natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), crude oil, and petrochemicals in the U.S., Canada, and the Gulf of Mexico. We recently
in April 2009 based on several positive investment measures, the strongest of which is the company's expanding profit margins.
Enterprise continues to deal with the effects of Hurricanes Gustav and Ike, but posted a record gross operating margin in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 despite the lingering difficulties. At the same time, NGL, crude oil, and petrochemical transportation volumes were a record 2.2 million barrels per day. The company's gross profit margin is rather low, but it has managed to increase from the same period last year. In addition, a net profit margin of 6.6% compares favorably to the industry average.
Management considered Enterprise's first quarter results to be a good start to fiscal 2009. The stock's performance has been lackluster recently, but we feel that its strengths outweigh the potential weakness at this time.
primarily operates and franchises McDonald's restaurants. In total, the corporation has more than 30,000 restaurants in more than 100 countries. We have
since March 2004, based on strengths such as its EPS and net income growth, strong profit margin results, and relatively strong performance in comparison to the
over the past year.
McDonald's reported on April 22 that its revenue decreased slightly in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, dropping 9.6% year over year. This decline did not seem to affect the company's bottom line, however, as EPS improved 7.4% when compared to the same quarter last year. We feel that the company's trend of positive EPS growth should continue. Although McDonald's gross profit margin decreased year over year, a result of 36.6% is still considered strong, and the company's net profit of 19.3% compares favorably with the rest of the industry. McDonald's net income increased slightly in the first quarter, rising 3.5% from $946.1 million to $979.5 million.
McDonald's attributed its first quarter results to strong global comparable sales, and management said that the company was confident about its ability to drive shareholder value and grow the business' value. Although the company's stock price is down 8.69% when compared to last year, we do not see anything in its fundamentals that is likely to cause a continuation of last year's declining stock price. No company is perfect, but we do not currently see any significant weakness that is likely to detract from McDonald's generally positive outlook.
Our quantitative rating, which can be viewed for any stock through our stock screener stock rating screener, is based on a variety of historical fundamental and pricing data and represents our opinion of a stock's risk-adjusted performance relative to other stocks. However, the rating does not incorporate all of the factors that can alter a stock's performance. For example, it doesn't always factor in recent corporate or industry events that could affect the stock price, nor does it include recent technology developments and competitive dynamics that may affect the company. For those reasons, we believe a rating alone cannot tell the whole story and should be part of an investor's overall research.