The Twitterverse is going nuts after Tesla Inc. (TSLA - Get Report) CEO Elon Musk tweeted over the weekend that the performance version of the Model 3 will end up costing around $78,000 - not including Autopilot.

What happened to the $35,000 Model 3?


The people who seem to think that the existence of a $78,000 Model 3 has any bearing on Tesla actually producing a $35,000 version of the car seem to not understand how car models work. Tesla isn't pulling a bait-and-switch here. Heck, it's not even doing anything that pretty much every other car brand on the planet hasn't been doing for decades.

Here's what Musk had to say:

Cost of all options, wheels, paint, etc is included (apart from Autopilot). Cost is $78k. About same as BMW M3, but 15% quicker & with better handling. Will beat anything in its class on the track.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 20, 2018

In his tweets, Musk specifically takes aim at the BMW M3, the performance model of BMW's 3-series, a car that starts right around $35,000. The 3-series has always been Tesla's gas-powered yardstick when developing the Model 3.

That's even how the then-unnamed Model 3 was described to investors at the Tesla factory back in 2012 when the very first Model S sedans were rolling off the assembly line.

The performance version of the BMW 3-series is the M3. The cheapest version of the M3 sitting at my local dealer right now is a base sedan that costs $75,189. In other words, it's more than twice the price of the lowest-cost 3-series, and around the same price tag as the comparable performance version of the Model 3.

Just about every carmaker offers high-performance variants of their lower-priced models that retail for multiples of what the base model costs. That's not a new business model.

Heck, even Kia's new top of the line Stinger GT2 sedan bases for around $50,000. And some dealers have reportedly even been selling it at a markup to MSRP.

Musk actually points out that the performance version of the Model 3 will be significantly quicker than the BMW M3 - maybe, in the scheme of things, that makes the $78,000 Model 3 a bargain?

One of the biggest criticisms of Tesla's Model 3 program has been that it's currently impossible to buy a $35,000 Model 3 today. And that's true. Like with the Model S and Model X launches, Tesla has started production by launching higher-optioned cars in order to make up for the lower margins that the firm experiences as it scales up production.

If you tried to price a Model 3 today, you'd have to buy a long-range version that starts around $44,000, plus get a $5,000 premium upgrades option.

Thing is, that's actually not far from where the average 3-series ends up after options, particularly when you factor in the value of tax credits on electric vehicles. According to car buying website TrueCar, the market average for a new BMW 3-series is $42,851.

In other words, current selling prices for the Model 3 aren't out of line with the most successful model in its class.

Tesla is guiding for the $35,000 Model 3 to be available in late 2018, once the company is consistently producing 5,000 vehicles a week at its Fremont factory. As many analysts have pointed out, that timeline for the cheaper base model car likely coincides with the start of the phase-out of the $7,500 Federal tax credit once Tesla reaches 200,000 vehicles delivered in the U.S.

But, as recent polls and comparable vehicle sales show, Tesla isn't likely to be demand-constrained on the Model 3 any time soon, even with an average net selling price above $40,000.

Ultimately, the $35,000 Model 3 may indeed be a rare sight on the streets. Just about as rare as the $35,000 BMW 3-series, in fact.

TheStreet presents on May 22: "How to Stomach Market Volatility." Hosted by Fisher Investments, the exclusive live webinar will give you the tools to successfully navigate market volatility and discuss why having a wealth manager is more critical than ever before. Quickly register for the event here.

This article is commentary by an independent contributor. At the time of publication, the author held no positions in the stocks mentioned.