NEW YORK (
received a buyout offer from Chinese meat producer
for $4.7 billion in cash.
The total value of the deal comes to about $7 billion, as Shuanghui said it will also assume Smithfield's debt. The $34-a-share offer price represents a 31% premium to Smithfield's closing share price on Tuesday.
Shuangui, which is China's largest pork producer, said the acquisition would allow it to supply more pork to China that meets food safety standards. In the midst of food safety scandals in the country, Shanghui itself was the subject of allegations that it used an illegal additive on its livestock.
China is the third-largest market for U.S. pork.
The acquisition is subject to regulatory approval. It is expected to close in the second half of the year.
have received national security clearance from regulators regarding SoftBank's proposed $20.1 billion stake in the cell phone carrier.
Sprint and SoftBank said that after clearance from the Treasury Department's Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, they've entered into a national security agreement with the U.S. government. If the two companies do combine, as part of the agreement the U.S. government will be able to veto any equipment purchases by Sprint from new vendors, according to
The Wall Street Journal
The companies said they expect the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security to notify the Federal Communications commission that they've completed their national security review. Upon notification, the FCC can finish its review of the deal.
Last week, Senator Charles Schumer expressed concern that the deal could expose U.S. government agencies and companies to Chinese cyber attacks. He asked regulators to "use extreme caution" when reviewing the proposal.
SoftBank has offered to buy a 70% stake in Sprint for $20.1 billion.
has launched a competing $25.5 billion offer for Sprint as a whole. Dish claims that the cyber attack issue is another reason why Sprint shareholders should consider its bid.
filed a $53 million preliminary settlement with customers unhappy with its liquid damage policy.
Lawyers on behalf of Apple consumers have alleged that Apple relied on faulty indicators of water damage on iPhones and iPods and wrongly denied customers their warranty claims as a result. They've argued that liquid submersion indicators could be set off by as little as moisture that occurs during ordinary use. If a liquid submersion indicator had been triggered, problems with Apple devices were then not protected under Apple's warranty.
Under the preliminary settlement agreement, affected consumers may be eligible for up to $300. Owners of iPhones that were rejected for warranty coverage on the basis of liquid damage before Dec. 31, 2009, and owners of iPod Touches denied before June 2010 are eligible to receive money from the settlement, which is still subject to court approval.
The chatter on Main Street (a.k.a. Google, Yahoo! and other search sites) is always of interest to investors on Wall Street. Thus, each day, TheStreet compiles the stories that are trending on the Web, and highlights the news that could make stocks move.
-- Written by Brittany Umar
Brittany joined TheStreet.com TV in November 2006 after completing a degree in Journalism and Media Studies at Rutgers College. Previously, Brittany interned at the local ABC affiliate in New York City WABC-TV 7 where she helped research and produce On Your Side, a popular consumer advocacy segment.