Run that by me again. Were there "a variety of catalysts" for yesterday's 900-point market move, or was there "no single catalyst"? Was it lower interest rates overseas or lower interest rates at home?

That depends on where you go for your news. Reports from major news organizations about why the market went up sharply yesterday were endlessly contradictory.

First, from

The Wall Street Journal

: "There were a variety of catalysts for the day's action, including news that lending markets are slowly unfreezing, a report that the government may be preparing to lend $5 billion to General Motors and hopes that the Federal Reserve will announce another interest-rate cut Wednesday. The Fed could push its target short-term lending rate down to 1%, which would equal the 40-year low in 2003."

Set that alongside

The New York Times

, which went with the more generally mystical coming-around-to-buying angle: "There was no single catalyst for the surge, and market specialists said investors seemed to be coming around to the idea that stocks were worth buying, given that the Dow had plunged 32 percent since the end of August."


New York Post

, for its part, sided more with its

News Corp.

(NWS) - Get Report

colleague, the


. The


said that the rally was driven by "a technical 'perfect storm' of factors converging at the depths of October's wretched slump to reverse the worst month on record for stocks."

But instead of leading with

General Motors

(GM) - Get Report

and the


, the


went with the yen and computer trading models. It also, it bears mentioning, saw significance in Halloween, placing the calendar in the lead: "Traders launched a global rally yesterday to help lift flattened portfolios off the ground and ignite investor spirits again -- just in time for Wall Street's hallowed October effect."

No Halloween over at the

"Financial Times"

. The major reason there was the yen carry trade. Here is its headline: "Stocks rally on talk of Tokyo rate cut." And its lead: "US stocks staged a fierce late rally on Tuesday after speculation that Japan could cut interest rates helped fuel a sharp reversal in the yen, easing concern about a sudden unwinding of the ¬so-called yen carry trade."



, the issue (with apologies to the


and the Tokyo rate cut) of an anticipated U.S. rate cut was so central, it went in the article summary: "Stocks stage dramatic comeback as the Fed begins the first day of a two-day meeting in which rate cuts are seen as a near certainty."

But the article opened with use of the catch-all "bargain hunters" as cause for the rise, with the issue of U.S. interest rates not appearing until down low in the article: "U.S. stocks blasted higher Tuesday afternoon, wiping away a week's worth of steep losses, as the Dow Jones Industrial Average jumped nearly 900 points -- its second biggest daily point gain ever - as bargain hunters flooded the market."

And where will we go from here? Well, at least according to the

Associated Press

, nowhere good. Here is its headline: "Dow ends up almost 900, but no one is exhaling: Late-day rally drives Dow up almost 900, but investors don't think surge will be sustained"

How many investors (note the affection of the plural) did they interview to get the right to make such a sweeping statement about the future? Uh, two investment strategist hacks, two economists (who actually agreed) and a carpenter from Deltona, Fla. Although, the carpenter doesn't technically comment on the market. He just talks about cutting back on Christmas gifts.

Does all the market commentary sound a bit flimsy and made-up-as-we-go-along? Bingo. What is most remarkable is that on a daily basis (as The Business Press Maven has pontificated before), we have whole narratives built around statistically insignificant movements in the stock market, motives written in honor of moves the size of rounding errors. Even with a 900-point move, we are still served up nonsense. But the reality of the situation does not run on such tidy story lines and easily digestible motives.

At the time of publication, Fuchs had no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in this column.

Marek Fuchs was a stockbroker for Shearson Lehman Brothers and a money manager before becoming a journalist who wrote The New York Times' "County Lines" column for six years. He also did back-up beat coverage of The New York Knicks for the paper's Sports section for two seasons and covered other professional and collegiate sports. He has contributed frequently to many of the Times' other sections, including National, Metro, Escapes, Style, Real Estate, Arts & Leisure, Travel, Money & Business, Circuits and the Op-Ed Page. For his "Business Press Maven? column on how business and finance are covered by the media, Fuchs was named best business journalist critic in the nation by the Talking Biz website at The University of North Carolina School of Journalism and Mass Communication. Fuchs is a frequent speaker on the business media, in venues ranging from National Public Radio to the annual conference of the Society of American Business Editors and Writers. Fuchs appreciates your feedback;

click here

to send him an email.