NEW YORK (MainStreet) -- Getting rejected is no fun, whether in love, employment or college admissions. But getting your Super Bowl ad rejected by the network isn't the worst thing in the world for a publicity-hungry company.

Internet users sometimes refer to this as the

"Streisand Effect"

: The idea that any attempt to censor information on the Internet inevitably leads to it being disseminated widely as users rush to get a taste of the forbidden fruit. The same phenomenon applies to advertising, especially in the Super Bowl. An ad that's rejected by the network for failing to meet its standards of decency immediately becomes a big news story, inevitably viewed by thousands of Internet users eager to see what was deemed too hot for TV.

Getting an ad in the Super Bowl can be a big boost for a company, but getting rejected doesn't hurt, either.

That's a level of (mostly) free publicity that many businesses can't refuse, and some companies will take advantage of this situation by submitting ads that they know will be rejected.

"This has been a trend for a while," says Adam Hanft, CEO of marketing and branding firm

Hanft Projects

. "It's a clever way for companies that don't have a Super Bowl-worthy ad budget to get some attention."

Consider, for instance, the 2011 ad for, or the cheaply made commercial for gay dating site, both of which were rejected by Fox for last year's Super Bowl. While it's not clear whether either site even had the money to fund a Super Bowl ad, since neither chose to run a tamer ad, each got a decent bump of publicity from the controversies. got more than a half-million views on YouTube, and was featured in major newspapers and discussed on

The View

. It's as close a thing to free publicity as any company could hope for.

>>3 Ways to Pay Off Your Mortgage Faster

Even well-established businesses can see the value of the lucrative scarlet letter of network rejection. Web domain registry

consistently airs racy advertisements during the Super Bowl, and


famously pulled the second airing of its

2005 Super Bowl ad

, which made light of the "wardrobe malfunction" controversy of the 2004 Super Bowl. The company continued to test network censors in subsequent years; while GoDaddy spokeswoman Elizabeth Driscoll denies that the company ever submitted an ad it knew would be rejected, she does says that GoDaddy needed 13 submissions before the network accepted its 2006 Super Bowl ad (attributing this to a "short leash" after the 2005 controversy).

So does kicking up a storm of controversy in this way actually pay dividends?

"It depends on the category

TST Recommends

of company," Hanft says. "Brands that are essentially transgressive to start with, when those are rejected, it reinforces what they stand for

and they thrive on the oxygen of the controversy." Indeed, and could reasonably claim that their ads were rejected on political grounds.

But the act may be starting to wear thin. As Ken Wheaton, managing editor of

Ad Age

notes, GoDaddy seems to have moved away from trying to gin up controversy. While the ads still rely on scantily clad women to sell domain names, Driscoll noted that there have been no issues with the networks for the past two years.

Meanwhile, cynical attempts to play the persecution card aren't getting as much mileage as they did last year.

Wheaton recently railed against, a "plus-sized" dating site that put together an ad of questionable quality and accused NBC of discriminating against larger women when it demanded the site rework the commercial. But the company doesn't seem to be getting as much mileage out of the controversy as it might have hoped.

The commercial

has only about 70,000 views on YouTube, and most viewers expressed dislike for it. Meanwhile, the major media outlets, apparently weary of such obvious public relations stunts, have given the site scant coverage.

These would-be advertisers are apparently losing column inches to the companies that are actually paying to run ads during the Super Bowl. It seems that as

more companies release their ads in advance of the Super Bowl

, the media now has real commercials to talk about in the run-up to the big game.

"Over the past two years you've been seeing companies extend the marketing window a couple weeks earlier, creating this huge hype and buzz," Hanft says. "And this has pushed out the news window for these other stunts."

>To submit a news tip, email:






and become a fan on