Skip to main content



) -- Bank regulators are not going overboard in tightening the screws on Wall Street's largest institutions, former

Securities and Exchange Commission

Chairwoman Mary Schapiro said at a finance and economics conference on Wednesday.

"We tend to be focused on the moment and forget that our financial institutions were in deep distress five years ago and were on the brink," she said in a panel discussion at

The Economist's

Buttonwood Gathering. "Rules and compliance have a cost but so does failure of rule-making and failure of compliance."

Schapiro, now managing director at regulatory compliance firm Promontory Financial Group, said that the complexity of the regulatory system was driven by the industry's desire to have nuanced approaches to rule-making and the fact that a number of regulators had to agree on the rules.

The fact that there has been slow progress in writing the rules reflects the desire of regulators to ensure regulations were less burdensome.

Jim Millstein, the former Treasury official who oversaw the restructuring of bailed-out insurer



Scroll to Continue

TheStreet Recommends

, said the regulatory response was appropriate given the size and complexity of the institutions. He argued that the banking industry has no market checks.

"Banks are immune to takeover because they are too big. Where is this market discipline?" he asked. "It is not through the debt market. Because of too big to fail, the debt markets subsidize them, not discipline them. So it is left to the regulators. We are going back to treating them as public utilities because there are no market checks on their power."

Their comments come amid industry complaints that the pendulum has swung too far on regulation, causing banks to restrict lending. Uncertainty about future regulations and the increasing cost of compliance are frequently cited by banks as a reason for lackluster loan growth.

Banks also continue to pay for the reckless practices of the boom period five years after the crisis.

JPMorgan Chase

, the bank that sailed through the crisis and took over two failing institutions, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual, at the behest of the government, is now facing a potential $13 billion fine to settle Department of Justice charges of mortgage fraud.

Supporters of the bank have said that the government is unfairly prosecuting the bank for the wrongdoings of units that they acquired at the height of the crisis.

Schapiro said that regulators including the SEC and the Department of Justice were responding to criticism that they hadn't done enough to hold Wall Street accountable.

The SEC had to enforce the law. It did not matter that the bank was large and meant well.

Banks that had management that was focused on compliance and that had the right compensation and controls in place were given the "benefit of doubt" when mistakes happened as opposed to banks where the management was not paying attention.

" We don't get to like or dislike anybody. We have to be neutral, but we have to look at things objectively," she said.

-- Written by Shanthi Bharatwaj from New York

Disclosure: TheStreet's editorial policy prohibits staff editors and reporters from holding positions in any individual stocks.