NEW YORK (ETF Expert) -- Ten short weeks ago, financial journalists celebrated a growth-stock renaissance in 2012, applauding the super-sized gains for growth funds and downplaying the performance of value-oriented counterparts. Year-to-date (through 10/1), large-company growth mutual funds had amassed 17.1% whereas large-cap value mutual funds had picked up 14.3%.
John Wagoner of
explained that the lag had to do with the remarkable upside in
. The author also noted, albeit briefly, that the gap between growth and value had narrowed considerably in the third quarter. Astute readers would have been wise to recognize that such a narrowing was evidence of a style shift.
Not surprisingly, fiscal cliff fears and Apple's -25% drawdown contributed to an ongoing migration to "Value Stock ETFs." So much so, in fact, that the value style for all market capitalization levels (i.e., large company, mid-sized company, small company) beat the growth style at all market capitalization levels over the past one, three and six months.
A key takeaway here is that for all the concerns about the fiscal cliff's adverse impact on dividend stocks, tax-gain harvesters went after their biggest capital appreciators (e.g., Apple, etc.) with an equal amount of ardor. It seems that in the end, slower-growing dividend yielders still provide a measure of safety in volatile markets; value trumps growth during squeamish bulls.
Even if you'd rather look at the year in aggregate, rather than over the last six months, value is still on top. At
Bill Maurer looked at the year-to-date performance (through Dec. 17) of iShares ETFs.
iShares Russell 1000 Value
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
iShares Russell Midcap Value
iShares Rusell Midcap Growth
iShares Russell 2000 Value
iShares Russell 2000 Growth
Granted, when tilting a portfolio one way or another -- big, small, value, growth, high beta, low beta -- the move must be made when the trend is in its early stages of development. It follows that what has already transpired may not be indicative of what will transpire in the weeks and months ahead.
One method for determining significant changes in relative strength is to check price ratios. A rising IWD:IWF price ratio tells me that the trend favoring value is still intact. Moreover, as long as IWD:IWF remains above an intermediate-term moving average like the 100-day, I am favoring dividend and value producers.
You can listen to the ETF Expert Radio Show "LIVE", via podcast or on your iPod. You can follow me on
This article is commentary by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.
Disclosure Statement: ETF Expert is a website that makes the world of ETFs easier to understand. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial and/or its clients may hold positions in ETFs, mutual funds and investment assets mentioned. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert website. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships. You may review additional ETF Expert at the site.
Gary Gordon reads:
On Twitter, Gary Gordon follows: