By Michael Johnston of ETF Database
The rise of the ETF industry is often attributed -- in large part at least -- to a shift in investor preference from pricey active management to low-cost indexing strategies.
ETFs burst on to the investment scene by offering fees equivalent to only a fraction of those charged by traditional actively managed mutual funds. They have continued to attract assets from investors frustrated with the inability of some actively managed funds to beat their benchmark indices.
But not all ETFs offer bargain-basement expense ratios. As the product offerings have become increasingly specialized and targeted in recent years, average fees have been on the rise.
This trend isn't necessarily attributable to issuer greed (the low end of the expense ratio range has expanded as well), but rather to the increasing complexity and granularity of exposure available through ETFs. Replicating the
simple task, but tracking the performance of more complex strategies or far-flung markets often incurs additional costs.
There is now a group of ETFs that has seen expense ratios climb above the 1% mark, venturing into mutual fund territory. Below we examine the five most expensive.
5. Market Vectors Gulf States Index ETF
Expense Ratio = 1.0%
This ETF tracks the
, a modified cap-weighted index that tracks the performance of equity markets in the Gulf states. With major allocations to Kuwait (41%), the United Arab Emirates (27%) and Qatar (22%), this fund offers exposure to a basket of securities most investors would otherwise have difficulty gaining access to.
4. IndexIQ Hedge Macro Tracker ETF
Expense Ratio = 1.10%*
MCRO is designed to replicate the performance of the
, a benchmark that replicates the risk-adjusted return characteristics of a combination of hedge funds pursuing a macro strategy and hedge funds pursuing an emerging markets strategy.
Like other hedge fund replication ETFs from
, MCRO is an "ETF of ETFs," meaning that its underlying holdings are not stocks and bonds but rather other ETFs.
Although this strategy is an efficient way to pursue complex strategies that include exposure to multiple asset classes, it also has the potential to increase expenses by creating multiple levels of costs.
MCRO charges an expense ratio of 75 basis points, but the acquired fund fees and expenses from MCRO's underlying holdings add another 35 basis points, resulting in an effective expense ratio of 1.10%. A big reason for MCRO's sizeable acquired funds expense is the 20% allocation to
, which charges 72 basis points.
3. S&P GSCI Enhanced Commodity Total Return ETN
Expense Ratio = 1.25%
Exchange-traded commodity products tend to be on the expensive side, but this product from
is expensive even for natural resource exposure.
GSC is linked to the
, a benchmark that serves as a composite of commodity sector returns representing an unleveraged, long-only investment in a diversified basket of commodity futures.
This ETN charges 1.25% in expenses, significantly higher than other diversified commodity products.
, for example, has an expense ratio of just 0.50%.
2. Dent Tactical ETF
: Expense Ratio = 1.56%
This ETF from
is one of the early entrants in the active ETF race. DENT doesn't track the performance of any benchmark. Rather it seeks to deliver long-term growth of capital by identifying, through proprietary economic and demographic analysis, the overall trend of the U.S. and global economies and how consumer spending patterns may change.
Similar to MCRO, DENT is an ETF of ETFs, currently maintaining ten approximately equal positions in sector-specific and broad-based funds from various ETF issuers. DENT charges a management fee of 95 basis points. But it also charges another 44 basis points in additional fees and another 17 basis points in acquired fund expenses, bringing the total cost to 1.56%.
1. PowerShares CEF Income Composite Portfolio
: Expense Ratio = 1.81%*
This ETF is based on the
, which tracks the performance of closed-end funds that invest in investment-grade fixed-income securities and high-yield fixed-income securities, as well as those that utilize an equity option writing strategy. PCEF charges an expense ratio of just 50 basis points, but acquired fund fees and expenses of 1.31% results in an "all-in" expense ratio of 1.81%.
This expense ratio hasn't deterred many investors; PCEF has accumulated nearly $40 million in assets less than a month after its launch.
For more ETF analysis, make sure to sign up for our
At the time of publication, Johnston had no positions in securities mentioned.
Michael Johnston is the senior analyst and founder of ETF Database, a Web-based investment resource providing actionable ETF investment ideas and an
for investors analyzing potential ETF investments. Johnston oversees ETF Database's free
, one of the most popular sources for news and commentary focusing exclusively on the exchange-traded fund industry. Johnston also maintains and develops content for
, a line of analyst reports and model portfolios designed to help investors utilize ETFs to meet their investment goals.
Johnston has completed the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) program, and obtained his bachelor's degree in finance from the University of Notre Dame. Prior to founding ETF Database, Michael worked in a private client service group performing valuations of companies operating in a wide range of industries.