Active Mismanagement: The Case for Index Funds
Indexing has suffered quite a backlash of late. From pundits proclaiming that "we're in a stock picker's market now" to columnists decrying the active management of the S&P 500, hitching your portfolio to an index seems like folly.
Actually, thinking you can consistently beat the market -- bear or bull -- is where the real folly lies.
It sure would be great if we could rely on active management to provide a little good news in this market. Unfortunately, the value-added that active managers bring -- even in this "stock-picker's" market -- is small to none.
In the first five months of 2002, the average actively managed fund underperformed the relevant Standard & Poor's index in seven of the nine Morningstar categories -- and one of the remaining two essentially tied the index. That's from a just-released study by veteran Vanguard Index fund manager Gus Sauter. (See charts below.) Keep in mind that indexing does not equate with the S&P 500 -- when a small-cap value fund beats the large cap growth-oriented S&P 500, it's irrelevant. ...
Recent Comments
| Dow Jones | S&P 500 | NASDAQ | 10-Year Note | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,309.92 | 1,091.49 | 2,138.44 | 32.31 |
Oil *
77.12
|
|
DOWN
154.48
|
DOWN
19.14
|
DOWN
37.61
|
DOWN
0.48
|
10 Yr
3.23%
SPDR Gold
115.06
|
|
-1.48%
|
-1.72%
|
-1.73%
|
-1.46%
|
Data delayed 20 minutes |


Connect with TheStreet