Sound Investing but Anemic Returns for Scudder Growth & Income
Scudder's (SCDGX)Growth & Income fund is a solid large-cap performer with a five-year annualized return of 17.9% and an abundance of name-brand stocks in its portfolio. Among its top holdings in 1998 were Ford (F), up 82% for the year; Xerox (XRX), up almost 60%; and Sprint (FON), which posted a 43% gain.
None of the fund's top 10 holdings as of Sept. 30 had negative returns for 1998, and only five of its top 25 holdings -- all small ones accounting for less than 2% of assets -- were in the red.
The fund's overall 1988 return? A measly 6.1%.
What happened? Simple. Growth & Income stuck to its value-investing guns, remained diversified and didn't buy any tech.In most years, this would be a winning strategy. In 1998, it was a formula for mediocrity.
|Source: Lipper Inc.|
- The $399.5 million (PANVX)Putnam New Value, with a median market capitalization of $19.3 billion, returned just 5.6% in 1998.
The $4.5 billion (NGUAX)Neuberger Berman Guardian fund, returned just 2.3%.
Perhaps the year's biggest dud, the $18.2 billion (VWNDX)Vanguard Windsor fund, returned an embarrassing 0.8%.
No Big-Cap GuaranteeBut not all large- and mid-cap stock funds reflected the high gains in those indices. That's a lesson a lot of investors will be learning in the next few weeks when they get year-end statements from their mutual fund companies. It was widely reported that 1998 was a terrible year for owners of small-cap funds. But it was supposed to be a great year for owners of large-cap stocks. Wasn't it? "I don't think it was a pretty good year, frankly, because most areas did not make money," says Steve Janachowski, an adviser and manager at Brouwer & Janachowski in Tiburon, Calif. "We're talking a very narrowly focused sector of the market" that made money. "I've been in this business for 15 years, and 1998 has been the most difficult market to explain," adds Chris Cordaro, an investment adviser with Bugen Stuart Korn & Cordaro in Chatham, N.J. "People's expectations are that they got close to the S&P 500 returns," says Cordaro. "But if they were on the value side, they didn't get it. And if you were on the small-cap side, you didn't get it. When they get their end-of-the-year statements this week and next week, they're going to get sticker shock. They're going to say, 'What happened?'"
It Helps to Hold TechFor Scudder Growth & Income, one of the things that happened was that it didn't buy technology. And that meant sitting out Wall Street's biggest party. Even Fidelity's (FMAGX)Magellan, which beat the S&P 500 for the first time since 1993, did it with the help of Microsoft (MSFT), Intel (INTC), Cisco Systems (CSCO) and America Online (AOL), all among its top 10 holdings as of Sept. 30. Scudder fesses up to the omission. "One of the things that hurt the fund was the lack of technology exposure," says Jeaneen Terrio, a spokeswoman for Scudder. (Scudder would not make managers Robert T. Hoffman or Benjamin W. Thorndike available to comment for this story.) But tech stocks, alas, don't typically pay dividends, a characteristic that keeps them out of many portfolios that put an emphasis on income. Terrio says those kinds of stocks didn't make the cut on Scudder's "yield screen."
Diversification a DrawbackScudder Growth & Income also suffered by comparison for its diversification, long a hallmark of sound investing. The fund held 112 stocks as of Sept. 30. Even though its biggest holding, Ford, rose 82%, it only accounted for 2.9% of your portfolio so the gains did not send overall returns through the roof. In contrast, some high-profile funds racked up spectacular gains with concentrated bets on a few stocks. (JAVLX)Janus Twenty, which held 27 stocks as of Sept. 30, gained 73.4% for 1998. (PLCPX)PBHG Large Cap 20, which holds 20 stocks, returned 67.8%. But a lack of tech and diversification isn't necessarily a bad thing. "That's not something really you can fault Scudder Growth & Income on," Cordaro says. "They stuck to their style, but it was a disappointment. I give those guys credit. When [a style] doesn't work, the last thing you want them to do is change their stripes. Because as soon as you change your stripes, you're going to get whipsawed in there." For investors who admire Scudder's consistency, Terrio has some comforting words: The fund won't change its stripes anytime soon. "It definitely over the long term has consistently delivered," she says.
Select the service that is right for you!COMPARE ALL SERVICES
- $2.5+ million portfolio
- Large-cap and dividend focus
- Intraday trade alerts from Cramer
- Weekly roundups
Access the tool that DOMINATES the Russell 2000 and the S&P 500.
- Buy, hold, or sell recommendations for over 4,300 stocks
- Unlimited research reports on your favorite stocks
- A custom stock screener
- Upgrade/downgrade alerts
- Diversified model portfolio of dividend stocks
- Alerts when market news affect the portfolio
- Bi-weekly updates with exact steps to take - BUY, HOLD, SELL
- Real Money + Doug Kass Plus 15 more Wall Street Pros
- Intraday commentary & news
- Ultra-actionable trading ideas
- 100+ monthly options trading ideas
- Actionable options commentary & news
- Real-time trading community
- Options TV