How a Sluggish Economy Hurts U.S. Foreign Policy
Similarly, Russia is using its natural gas sales to Europe and stated-controlled Gazprom's (OGZPY) control of critical choke points in the eastern EU's pipeline infrastructure to blackmail the Ukraine and warn others in Europe of very cold winters if they don't let it keep what it has stolen in the Crimea.
Opening U.S. markets to Chinese products and other trade deals has proven no bonanza for the U.S. economy. For example, thanks to Beijing's high tariffs and administrative barriers to imports, currency manipulation and other subsidies to its exports, and piracy of intellectual property the U.S. economy is burdened with a $275 billion bilateral trade deficit that is killing about 4 million jobs.
Of course, the U.S. has failed to play its strengths by failing to develop its own abundant offshore oil. The resulting $230 billion petroleum trade deficit is killing at least another 3 million jobs.
Consequently, the U.S. economy has grown a paltry 1.7% annually since 2000 -- half the pace accomplished during the prior two decades. Obama, short on revenue but eager to finance national health care, food stamps and other entitlements, has sacrificed vital investments in troop strength and equipment modernization.Now, U.S. foreign policy has a double deficit -- resources and courage. In Europe, the U.S. lacks assets on the ground to effectively challenge Russias incursions into the Ukraine. And German Chancellor Angela Merkel can't rally domestic support for stronger economic sanctions against Moscow, because German multinationals are fearful of losing too much business. In the Pacific, the president is refusing to commit American naval resources to confront Chinese ships that run off Philippine fishermen and harass Japanese vessels, and generally violate international law guaranteeing freedom of navigation. Moscow wants back several parts of its lost empire and to challenge U.S. objectives in places such as Syria and Iran. Beijing is seeking dominance in the western Pacific and to assert its authoritarian political system as a viable alternative to American-style democracy. Unless American diplomacy is backed up by a credible U.S. military commitment and an economy that can support it, Moscow and Beijing will succeed to the peril of U.S. interests and our allies in Europe and the Pacific. In the end, U.S. presidents cant continue to pursue foolish international trade and energy policies and sacrifice military spending to increase entitlements popular with voters, without living in a much more dangerous world. >>Read More: Is Google Crazy for Selling a PC at $350? Definitely Not >>Read More: Xerox Is the Biggest Secret in Value Stocks as It Moves Beyond Copiers >>Read More: Mark Zuckerberg Bets Big on the Bay Area Follow @pmorici1 This article represents the opinion of a contributor and not necessarily that of TheStreet or its editorial staff.
Check Out Our Best Services for Investors
- $2.5+ million portfolio
- Large-cap and dividend focus
- Intraday trade alerts from Cramer
Access the tool that DOMINATES the Russell 2000 and the S&P 500.
- Buy, hold, or sell recommendations for over 4,300 stocks
- Unlimited research reports on your favorite stocks
- A custom stock screener
- Model portfolio
- Stocks trading below $10
- Intraday trade alerts