(SP) has become popular, too. This is a natural gas distribution play with a fine yield that doesn't need to do massive equity financings. It's a quiet winner like so many others on the list.
Oh, and there's Vornado
(VNO), a growth real estate investment trust that yields almost 3%. This one has been left for dead at various times, and that is ridiculous, because the canny Steve Roth runs it. I would buy it on any weakness, because it has a solid combination of office and retail properties, especially in the rent-rising areas of New York City.
Some of the others are eye-opening, however. Let's take Allergan
(AGN). The story of Allergan is a cautionary one -- for all of those who are dumping Gilead
(GILD) and Celgene
(CELG), that is. In the tumultuous decline from the $120s to the $80s, one after another analyst turned on the Allergan, saying that it had around-the-corner generic competition for a key eye drug, Latisse. It was incredible; no matter what the company did, it couldn't stop the rumor-mongering about the generic competition. It got so ugly that the CEO, David Pyott, whom I have come to know and like very much, came on "Mad Money" when the stock was in the $80s and said that the patent challenge simply wouldn't hold up and that we would soon be hearing from Allergan about new formulations that couldn't be replicated anyway.
[Read: Is China State Company Reform Real or a Ruse?]
When it finally filtered out that the challenge would fail, the stock simply never looked back. But boy, was it painful while it was happening.
How about Snap-On
, which is on tonight? This is a company that has a remarkable, unique franchise that provides the best tools to professional mechanics. It is always inventing new tools -- I call it a "stealth technologist" in Get Rich Carefully. There's no competition.
and Range Resources
are pure-play natural gas companies that keep finding more gas and are low-cost producers. They are part and parcel with the energy revolution, but they are also rallying under the false hope that they will provide natural gas to nat-gas-starved places. They are strictly local, and Cheniere
, the first plant to export, won't be ready for several years. I know from my colleague Matt Horween that Chesapeake Energy
is breaking out, too. The group can't be kept down.
After utilities. it is the oil-service business that predominates notably: Schlumberger
, Baker Hughe
, Helmerich & Payne
and Halliburton. (If my fave, Core Laboratories
, were in the S&P 500
you'd see that, too.) Now when you go listen to the commentary of, say, Baker Hughes, it's pretty obvious what is happening: the North American energy revolution. Baker Hughes on its conference call called out the Permian as one of the fastest-growing areas around the world, verifying, again, that Pioneer Natural Resources
and EOG Resources
need to be owned. The rest are pretty darned eclectic, like Allergan and Snap-On. For example, in a real irony,
is on the list. Lots of people credit the beginning of the selloff that we've experienced with comments CEO Michael Jackson gave to Squawk Box about how business has fallen off a cliff and that the car companies were dreaming if they thought they could make their numbers.
Well, guess what? The weather got good, and those inventories cleaned up real fast, and now it's on the 52-week high list, no doubt on the backs of short-sellers who listened to Jackson on television. Oh well, at least he told you on the call that things had gotten better.
One of my absolute favorite companies is and always has been Kimberly-Clark
. The company is never satisfied, always trying to boost the dividend or restructure, and it is willing to sacrifice sales on the altar of profit margins as it did when it ceded the Western Europe diaper market to Procter & Gamble
not that long ago. This company is spinning off its healthcare division, and that has caused me to re-recommend it with a fervor to fill the void of analysts who don't care for it. I think it can inch up to $120 over time, but the dividend protection up there will be meager. No matter, the pieces of the company are worth more than the whole.
I have always like Ball
ever since it got rid of the Ball jar business and became much more of a high-tech company, particularly in aerospace. It maintains a can business that I think, if spun off, would send the stock much higher. Perhaps that's why it is running?